Disc Medicine IRON

Disc Medicine reported a $59.54 million net loss

Quarterly report for the period ended Sep 30, 2026, 3 new risk factors

Form
10-Q
Filed
Importance
Notable
  1. Net loss of $59.54 million for the three months ended Sep 30, 2026
  2. Diluted EPS of -$1.53 for the three months ended Sep 30, 2026
  3. Cash and equivalents of $89.98 million as of Sep 30, 2026

Written from the 10-Q on EDGAR. AI can make mistakes. Check the filing.

Get an email when Disc Medicine files

Only major filings: results, leadership changes, listing notices and other major events, each with the plain-English summary when we have one or the key facts and the EDGAR link. Routine insider filings never email. Confirm once; unsubscribe in one click.

What changed

26 changes since the June 2026 10-Q

Compared with the 10-Q 0001193125-26-325034, filed Jul 30, 2026.

  1. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    On October 20, 2026, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") with Jefferies LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Cantor as representatives of the several…

    From the filings

    Now

    On October 20, 2026, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") with Jefferies LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Cantor as representatives of the several underwriters listed on Schedule I thereto (the "Underwriters") related to an underwritten offering of 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $ 0.0001 per share, at a price to the public of $ 75.00 per share.
  2. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    In addition, the Company granted the Underwriters an option exercisable for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement to purchase, at the public offering price less any underwriting discounts and commissions…

    From the filings

    Now

    In addition, the Company granted the Underwriters an option exercisable for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement to purchase, at the public offering price less any underwriting discounts and commissions, up to an additional 900,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which option the Underwriters exercised in full on October 26, 2026.
  3. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    The net proceeds from the offering are expected to be approximately $ 485.9 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses.

    From the filings

    Now

    The net proceeds from the offering are expected to be approximately $ 485.9 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses.
  4. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    Certain existing investors and affiliates of the Company participated in the offering.

    From the filings

    Now

    Certain existing investors and affiliates of the Company participated in the offering.
  5. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    On November 4, 2026, Cantor acknowledged and accepted the Company's written notice to terminate the Cantor ATM Agreement, which termination became effective on November 4, 2026.

    From the filings

    Now

    On November 4, 2026, Cantor acknowledged and accepted the Company's written notice to terminate the Cantor ATM Agreement, which termination became effective on November 4, 2026.
  6. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    As a result of such termination, the Company will not offer or sell any additional shares of its common stock under the Cantor ATM Agreement.

    From the filings

    Now

    As a result of such termination, the Company will not offer or sell any additional shares of its common stock under the Cantor ATM Agreement.
  7. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    On November 5, 2026, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the "TD Cowen ATM Agreement"), with TD Securities (USA) LLC ("TD Cowen"), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock…

    From the filings

    Now

    On November 5, 2026, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the "TD Cowen ATM Agreement"), with TD Securities (USA) LLC ("TD Cowen"), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock having aggregate gross proceeds of up to approximately $ 189.9 million from time to time in "at-the-market" offerings through TD Cowen, as sales agent.
  8. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    The Company agreed to pay TD Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of any shares sold by TD Cowen under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement.

    From the filings

    Now

    The Company agreed to pay TD Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of any shares sold by TD Cowen under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement.
  9. New Legal proceedings

    New legal mention

    As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not sold any shares of common stock under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement.

    From the filings

    Now

    As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not sold any shares of common stock under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement.
  10. Changed Financial statements

    Cash down 8.8% from Jun 30

    $90M, was $98.7M.

    From the filings

    Before

    $98.7M

    Now

    $90M
  11. Changed Financial statements

    EPS up 0.6% from Jun 30

    −$1.53, was −$1.54.

    From the filings

    Before

    −$1.54

    Now

    −$1.53
  12. Changed Financial statements

    Net income flat from Jun 30

    −$59.5M, was −$59.5M.

    From the filings

    Before

    −$59.5M

    Now

    −$59.5M
  13. Changed Risk factors

    Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to…

    Adds "other than bitopertin"; drops "only".

    From the filings

    Before

    Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates. Until such time, if ever, we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. Other than up to $50.0 million of additional advances that may be drawn at our option until April 30, 2027 under the Hercules Loan Agreement, we do not have any committed external source of funds. The terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of those securities may include liquidation or other preferences that may materially adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Additional debt financing, if available, would increase our fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, acquiring, selling or licensing intellectual property rights, and making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required to meet certain milestones in connection with debt financing and the failure to achieve such milestones by certain dates may force us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us which could have a material adverse effect on our business…

    Now

    Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our stockholders, restrict our operations or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates. Until such time, if ever, we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of private and public equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. Other than up to $50.0 million of additional advances that may be drawn at our option until April 30, 2027 under the Hercules Loan Agreement, we do not have any committed external source of funds. The terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of common stock or securities convertible or exchangeable into common stock, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of those securities may include liquidation or other preferences that may materially adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Additional debt financing, if available, would increase our fixed payment obligations and may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, acquiring, selling or licensing intellectual property rights, and making capital expenditures, declaring dividends or other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We could also be required to meet certain milestones in connection with debt financing and the failure to achieve such milestones by certain dates may force us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us which could have a material adverse effect on our business…
  14. Changed Risk factors

    Because we are developing some of our product candidates for the treatment of diseases in which there is…

    Adds "Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled"; drops "ongoing".

    From the filings

    Before

    Because we are developing some of our product candidates for the treatment of diseases in which there is little clinical experience and, in some cases, using new endpoints or methodologies, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may not consider the endpoints of our clinical trials to predict or provide clinically meaningful results. Many of our product candidates are designed to treat diseases for which there are few available therapeutic options. For example, in the United States there are currently no therapies approved to treat anemia of MF and there is only one approved therapy to treat EPP. As a result, the design and conduct of clinical trials of product candidates for the treatment of these diseases may take longer, be more costly or be less effective as part of the novelty of development in these diseases. In some cases, we may use new or novel endpoints or methodologies. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may not consider the endpoints of our clinical trials to be validated or clinically meaningful and we may need to conduct proof-of-concept studies or additional work to refine our endpoints and inform the design of future studies before initiating pivotal studies of our product candidates. Even if applicable regulatory authorities do not object to our proposed endpoints in an earlier stage clinical trial, such regulatory authorities may require evaluation of additional or different clinical endpoints in later-stage clinical trials. Even if the FDA does find our clinical trial success criteria to be sufficiently supported and clinically meaningful at the time, we may not achieve the pre-specified endpoint to a degree of statistical significance in any pivotal or other clinical trials we may conduct for our product candidates. Further, even if we do achieve the pre-specified criteria, our trials may produce results that are unpredictable or inconsistent with the results of the more traditional efficacy endpoints in the trial. For example, in the…

    Now

    Because we are developing some of our product candidates for the treatment of diseases in which there is little clinical experience and, in some cases, using new endpoints or methodologies, the FDA or other regulatory authorities may not consider the endpoints of our clinical trials to predict or provide clinically meaningful results. Many of our product candidates are designed to treat diseases for which there are few available therapeutic options. For example, in the United States there are currently no therapies approved to treat anemia of MF and there is only one approved therapy to treat EPP. As a result, the design and conduct of clinical trials of product candidates for the treatment of these diseases may take longer, be more costly or be less effective as part of the novelty of development in these diseases. In some cases, we may use new or novel endpoints or methodologies. The FDA or other regulatory authorities may not consider the endpoints of our clinical trials to be validated or clinically meaningful and we may need to conduct proof-of-concept studies or additional work to refine our endpoints and inform the design of future studies before initiating pivotal studies of our product candidates. Even if applicable regulatory authorities do not object to our proposed endpoints in an earlier stage clinical trial, such regulatory authorities may require evaluation of additional or different clinical endpoints in later-stage clinical trials. Even if the FDA does find our clinical trial success criteria to be sufficiently supported and clinically meaningful at the time, we may not achieve the pre-specified endpoint to a degree of statistical significance in any pivotal or other clinical trials we may conduct for our product candidates. Further, even if we do achieve the pre-specified criteria, our trials may produce results that are unpredictable or inconsistent with the results of the more traditional efficacy endpoints in the trial. For example, in the…
  15. Changed Risk factors

    • factors we may not be able to control, including the impacts of any public health crises, that may limit…

    Adds "initial"; drops "BEACON and AURORA".

    From the filings

    Before

    • factors we may not be able to control, including the impacts of any public health crises, that may limit patients, principal investigators or staff or clinical site availability. Results from early preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates are not necessarily predictive of the results of later preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates. If we cannot replicate the results from earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates in our later preclinical studies and clinical trials, we may be unable to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates. Any results from early preclinical studies and clinical trials of bitopertin, selcodebart, DISC-0998, DISC-3405 or our other product candidates or programs may not necessarily be predictive of the results from later preclinical studies and clinical trials. For example, we previously announced positive data from our Phase 2 BEACON and AURORA clinical trials of bitopertin in patients with EPP, but there can be no assurance that our Phase 3 APOLLO clinical trial of bitopertin in patients with EPP will be successful or that the results of our APOLLO clinical trial will support a traditional approval of bitopertin for EPP. In addition, we previously announced positive initial data from our RALLY-MF Phase 2 clinical trial of selcodebart in patients with anemia of MF. However, there can be no assurance that selcodebart will achieve the desired effects in this indication. Further, we announced positive results from a Phase 1 clinical trial of DISC-3405 in healthy adult volunteers in December 2024 and June 2025, which may not be indicative or predictive of future clinical trial results. Similarly, even if we are able to complete our planned preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates according to our current development timeline, the results from such…

    Now

    • factors we may not be able to control, including the impacts of any public health crises, that may limit patients, principal investigators or staff or clinical site availability. Results from early preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates are not necessarily predictive of the results of later preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates. If we cannot replicate the results from earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials of our programs and product candidates in our later preclinical studies and clinical trials, we may be unable to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize our product candidates. Any results from early preclinical studies and clinical trials of bitopertin, selcodebart, DISC-0998, DISC-3405 or our other product candidates or programs may not necessarily be predictive of the results from later preclinical studies and clinical trials. For example, we previously announced positive initial data from our RALLY-MF Phase 2 clinical trial of selcodebart in patients with anemia of MF and from our RESTORE-PV Phase 2 clinical trial of DISC-3405 in patients with PV. However, there can be no assurance that selcodebart or DISC-3405 will achieve the desired effects in the respective indication. Similarly, even if we are able to complete our planned preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates according to our current development timeline, the results from such preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be replicated in subsequent preclinical studies or clinical trial results. Many companies in the biopharmaceutical and biotechnology industries have suffered significant setbacks in late-stage clinical trials after achieving positive results in early-stage development, and we cannot be certain that we will not face similar setbacks. These setbacks have been caused by, among other things, preclinical findings…
  16. Changed Risk factors

    • the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may…

    Adds "With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and…"; drops "ongoing".

    From the filings

    Before

    • the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change such that our clinical data are insufficient for approval. For example, we submitted an NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States in September 2025. In February 2026, the FDA issued a CRL. Although the FDA agreed that clinical data from our AURORA and BEACON clinical trials provided sufficient evidence that bitopertin significantly lowers whole blood metal-free PPIX, the FDA concluded that the trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials. As such, the FDA determined that there is uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect in PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. As a result, the FDA did not approve our NDA and indicated instead that we would need to provide evidence of a clinical benefit from an additional clinical trial, such as our ongoing APOLLO trial, to support a potential traditional approval. Even if we were to obtain regulatory approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, thereby narrowing the commercial potential of the product candidate. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects for our product candidates.

    Now

    • the approval policies or regulations of the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may significantly change such that our clinical data are insufficient for approval. For example, we submitted an NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States in September 2025. In February 2026, the FDA issued a CRL. Although the FDA agreed that clinical data from our AURORA and BEACON clinical trials provided sufficient evidence that bitopertin significantly lowers whole blood metal-free PPIX, the FDA concluded that the trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials. As such, the FDA determined that there is uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect in PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. As a result, the FDA did not approve our NDA and indicated instead that we would need to provide evidence of a clinical benefit from an additional clinical trial, such as our APOLLO trial, to support a potential traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026 and would then anticipate an FDA decision on our NDA by mid-2027. Even if we were to obtain regulatory approval, regulatory authorities may approve any of our product candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, thereby narrowing the commercial potential of the product candidate. In addition, regulatory authorities may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials, or may approve a product candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that product candidate. Any of the foregoing scenarios could materially harm the commercial prospects…
  17. Changed Risk factors

    We have established collaborations with Mabwell and NIH and may seek to establish additional collaborations…

    Adds "Section 851 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, enacted"; drops "legislation pending".

    From the filings

    Before

    We have established collaborations with Mabwell and NIH and may seek to establish additional collaborations, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans. Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, such as our collaborations with Mabwell and NIH, for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator's resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator's own evaluation of a potential collaboration. Such factors a potential collaborator will use to evaluate a collaboration may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be…

    Now

    We have established collaborations with Mabwell and NIH and may seek to establish additional collaborations, and, if we are not able to establish them on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, we may have to alter our development and commercialization plans. Our product development programs and the potential commercialization of our product candidates will require substantial additional cash to fund expenses. For some of our product candidates, we may decide to collaborate with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, such as our collaborations with Mabwell and NIH, for the development and potential commercialization of those product candidates. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator's resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator's own evaluation of a potential collaboration. Such factors a potential collaborator will use to evaluate a collaboration may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be…
  18. Changed Risk factors

    We may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our product candidates, and we may be unsuccessful or may…

    Adds "With the positive topline results from APOLLO,"; drops "ongoing".

    From the filings

    Before

    We may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our product candidates, and we may be unsuccessful or may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for market exclusivity. We have received orphan drug designation from the FDA for bitopertin for the treatment of EPP and for DISC-3405 for the treatment of PV. As part of our business strategy, we may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our product candidates and indications, as appropriate. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and Europe, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug or biologic as an orphan drug if it is a product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population of 200,000 or more in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the product will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. Similarly, in the European Union, the European Commission, upon the recommendation of the EMA's Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, grants orphan designation in respect of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 persons in the European Union. Additionally, designation may be granted for products intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the product in the European Union would generate…

    Now

    We may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our product candidates, and we may be unsuccessful or may be unable to maintain the benefits associated with orphan drug designation, including the potential for market exclusivity. We have received orphan drug designation from the FDA for bitopertin for the treatment of EPP and for DISC-3405 for the treatment of PV. As part of our business strategy, we may seek orphan drug designation for certain of our product candidates and indications, as appropriate. Regulatory authorities in some jurisdictions, including the United States and Europe, may designate drugs for relatively small patient populations as orphan drugs. Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may designate a drug or biologic as an orphan drug if it is a product intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is generally defined as a patient population of fewer than 200,000 individuals annually in the United States, or a patient population of 200,000 or more in the United States where there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing the product will be recovered from sales in the United States. In the United States, orphan drug designation entitles a party to financial incentives such as opportunities for grant funding towards clinical trial costs, tax advantages and user-fee waivers. Similarly, in the European Union, the European Commission, upon the recommendation of the EMA's Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, grants orphan designation in respect of products that are intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of life-threatening or chronically debilitating conditions affecting no more than 5 in 10,000 persons in the European Union. Additionally, designation may be granted for products intended for the diagnosis, prevention, or treatment of a life-threatening, seriously debilitating or serious and chronic condition when, without incentives, it is unlikely that sales of the product in the European Union would generate…
  19. Changed Risk factors

    The GDPR provides that EEA Member States may make their own further laws and regulations in relation to the…

    Adds "or the".

    From the filings

    Before

    The GDPR provides that EEA Member States may make their own further laws and regulations in relation to the processing of genetic, biometric or health data, which could result in differences between Member States, limit our ability to use and share personal data or could cause our costs to increase, and harm our business and financial condition. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EEA and UK not deemed adequate for the transfer of such personal data by competent data protection authorities, or third countries, including the United States in certain circumstances unless a derogation exists or we may need to incorporate a GDPR transfer mechanism (such as the European Commission approved standard contractual clauses, or SCCs or the UK International Data Transfer Addendum, or IDTA) into our agreements with third parties to govern such transfers of personal data and carry out transfer impact assessments. Further, the European Union and United States have adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, or the Framework, which entered into force on July 11, 2023. This Framework provides that the protection of personal data transferred between the European Union and the United States is comparable to that offered in the European Union. This provides a further avenue to ensuring transfers to the United States are carried out in line with GDPR. There has been an extension to the Framework to cover UK transfers to the United States. The Framework could be challenged like its predecessor frameworks. The international transfer obligations under the EEA and UK data protection regimes will require effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA/UK personal data is located and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA/UK personal data. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU GDPR, the European Commission has…

    Now

    The GDPR provides that EEA Member States may make their own further laws and regulations in relation to the processing of genetic, biometric or health data, which could result in differences between Member States, limit our ability to use and share personal data or could cause our costs to increase, and harm our business and financial condition. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the EEA and UK not deemed adequate for the transfer of such personal data by competent data protection authorities, or third countries, including the United States in certain circumstances unless a derogation exists or we may need to incorporate a GDPR transfer mechanism (such as the European Commission approved standard contractual clauses, or SCCs or the UK International Data Transfer Addendum, or IDTA) into our agreements with third parties to govern such transfers of personal data and carry out transfer impact assessments. Further, the European Union and United States have adopted its adequacy decision for the EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework, or the Framework, which entered into force on July 11, 2023. This Framework provides that the protection of personal data transferred between the European Union and the United States is comparable to that offered in the European Union. This provides a further avenue to ensuring transfers to the United States are carried out in line with GDPR. There has been an extension to the Framework to cover UK transfers to the United States. The Framework could be challenged like its predecessor frameworks. The international transfer obligations under the EEA and UK data protection regimes will require effort and cost and may result in us needing to make strategic considerations around where EEA/UK personal data is located and which service providers we can utilize for the processing of EEA/UK personal data. Although the UK is regarded as a third country under the EU GDPR, the European Commission has…
  20. Changed Risk factors

    The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in our business may result in…

    Adds "numerous AI-focused"; drops "Over the past year,".

    From the filings

    Before

    The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in our business may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential and/or proprietary information, including personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability. We may use and integrate artificial intelligence, or AI, into our business processes, and this innovation presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore our business. If we enable or offer solutions that draw controversy due to perceived or actual negative societal impact, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm or legal liability. The use of certain AI technology can give rise to cybersecurity and intellectual property risks, including compromises to personal or other confidential information, proprietary intellectual property and intellectual property infringement. To the extent we develop our own AI systems, then the risk of intellectual property infringement could arise from third party data sources being used to train our AI models, and from the output of AI systems reproducing or incorporating third party intellectual property rights, in each case without the right to do so. Further, a risk of our proprietary intellectual property rights being compromised through the use of AI could arise through third party vendors using our data to train their models and/or to generate output for other users of their systems. If our third party vendors use our data (which includes personal data) to train their AI models and/or to generate output for other users of their systems, this could also give rise to regulatory risks. Additionally, we expect to see increasing government and supranational regulation related to AI use and ethics, which may also significantly increase the burden and cost of research, development and compliance in…

    Now

    The use of new and evolving technologies, such as artificial intelligence, in our business may result in spending material resources and presents risks and challenges that can impact our business including by posing security and other risks to our confidential and/or proprietary information, including personal information, and as a result we may be exposed to reputational harm and liability. We may use and integrate artificial intelligence, or AI, into our business processes, and this innovation presents risks and challenges that could affect its adoption, and therefore our business. If we enable or offer solutions that draw controversy due to perceived or actual negative societal impact, we may experience brand or reputational harm, competitive harm or legal liability. The use of certain AI technology can give rise to cybersecurity and intellectual property risks, including compromises to personal or other confidential information, proprietary intellectual property and intellectual property infringement. To the extent we develop our own AI systems, then the risk of intellectual property infringement could arise from third party data sources being used to train our AI models, and from the output of AI systems reproducing or incorporating third party intellectual property rights, in each case without the right to do so. Further, a risk of our proprietary intellectual property rights being compromised through the use of AI could arise through third party vendors using our data to train their models and/or to generate output for other users of their systems. If our third party vendors use our data (which includes personal data) to train their AI models and/or to generate output for other users of their systems, this could also give rise to regulatory risks. Additionally, we expect to see increasing government and supranational regulation related to AI use and ethics, which may also significantly increase the burden and cost of research, development and compliance in…
  21. Changed Risk factors

    We expect to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing…

    Adds "September"; drops "June".

    From the filings

    Before

    We expect to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations. As of June 30, 2026, we had 165 full-time employees and no part-time employees. We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly as we mature as a public company and in the areas of product development, regulatory affairs and, in anticipation of the potential regulatory approval of bitopertin, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations. We also conducted an organizational restructuring in February 2026. We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits, savings and improvements in our cost structure from this restructuring effort due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If we are unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from this restructuring, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. Furthermore, the effects of this restructuring may be disruptive to our operations. For example, headcount reductions could yield unanticipated consequences, such as increased difficulties in implementing our business strategy, including retention of remaining employees. We…

    Now

    We expect to expand our development and regulatory capabilities and potentially implement sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, and as a result, we may encounter difficulties in managing our growth, which could disrupt our operations. As of September 30, 2026, we had 173 full-time employees and no part-time employees. We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly as we mature as a public company and in the areas of product development, regulatory affairs and, in anticipation of the potential regulatory approval of bitopertin, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations. We have acquired, and in the future may acquire additional, businesses or products, and we may form strategic alliances or create joint ventures with third parties that we believe will complement or augment our existing business. If we acquire businesses with promising markets or technologies, we may not be able to realize the benefit of acquiring such businesses if we are unable to successfully integrate them with our existing operations and company culture. We may encounter numerous difficulties in developing, manufacturing and marketing any new products resulting from a strategic alliance or acquisition that delay or prevent us from realizing their expected benefits or enhancing our business. We cannot assure you…
  22. New MD&A

    In October 2026, we announced positive topline results from APOLLO, a randomized, double-blind, pivotal…

    New paragraph in MD&A.

    From the filings

    Now

    In October 2026, we announced positive topline results from APOLLO, a randomized, double-blind, pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of bitopertin versus placebo in adults and adolescents aged 12 or older with EPP or XLP. Bitopertin achieved statistical significance on both co-primary endpoints versus placebo, with reduction in whole-blood metal-free protoporphyrin IX, or PPIX, from baseline (-41.4% vs. placebo, p<0.0001) and increase in average monthly total time in light without pain during month 6 (+12.2 hours vs. placebo, p=0.0010). Bitopertin also achieved statistical significance on all secondary endpoints versus placebo, including reduction in incidence rate of phototoxic reactions over the 6-month treatment period (p<0.0001), increase in cumulative total time in light without pain over the 6-month treatment period (p<0.0001), and increase in change from baseline in average daily sunlight exposure time to prodrome (p=0.0077, adults only). In addition, bitopertin demonstrated additional quality of life benefits versus placebo, including improved Patient Global Impression of Change, or PGIC, score (p<0.0001) and Patient Global Impression of Severity, or PGIS, score (p<0.0001). Bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. Consistent with prior studies, dizziness was the most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse event, or TEAE, in the bitopertin group (50%) and was mild or moderate and generally transient. There were no TEAEs above Grade 3.
  23. Changed MD&A

    We have also completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label, parallel-dose…

    Adds "also"; drops "the toxic metabolite, protoporphyrin IX, or".

    From the filings

    Before

    We have completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label, parallel-dose clinical trial in EPP and XLP patients conducted at sites in Australia, and AURORA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in EPP patients conducted at sites in the United States. In both trials, bitopertin significantly reduced the toxic metabolite, protoporphyrin IX, or PPIX, and was associated with improvements in measures of time spent in sunlight and quality of life. In addition, bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. All participants in AURORA and BEACON were eligible to participate in HELIOS, an ongoing open-label, long-term extension study of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients. Interim data from HELIOS, presented in June 2025 and June 2026, demonstrated that longer term treatment of bitopertin was associated with sustained reductions in PPIX, as well as improvements in quality of life and liver biomarkers. Bitopertin is also currently being studied in APOLLO, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients that we initiated in May 2025. In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States based on our Phase 2 data. The FDA accepted our NDA for review in November 2025 and in February 2026 issued a complete response letter, or CRL. The FDA concluded that the AURORA and BEACON trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials, resulting in uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. In our Type A meeting during the second quarter of 2026, the FDA indicated that results of the ongoing Phase 3 APOLLO trial, if successful, could…

    Now

    We have also completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label, parallel-dose clinical trial in EPP and XLP patients conducted at sites in Australia, and AURORA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in EPP patients conducted at sites in the United States. In both trials, bitopertin significantly reduced PPIX and was associated with improvements in measures of time spent in sunlight and quality of life. In addition, bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. All participants in AURORA and BEACON were eligible to participate in HELIOS, an ongoing open-label, long-term extension study of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients. Interim data from HELIOS, presented in June 2025 and June 2026, demonstrated that longer term treatment of bitopertin was associated with sustained reductions in PPIX, as well as improvements in quality of life and liver biomarkers.
  24. Changed MD&A

    In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP…

    Adds "U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the"; drops "We have completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label…".

    From the filings

    Before

    We have completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label, parallel-dose clinical trial in EPP and XLP patients conducted at sites in Australia, and AURORA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in EPP patients conducted at sites in the United States. In both trials, bitopertin significantly reduced the toxic metabolite, protoporphyrin IX, or PPIX, and was associated with improvements in measures of time spent in sunlight and quality of life. In addition, bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. All participants in AURORA and BEACON were eligible to participate in HELIOS, an ongoing open-label, long-term extension study of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients. Interim data from HELIOS, presented in June 2025 and June 2026, demonstrated that longer term treatment of bitopertin was associated with sustained reductions in PPIX, as well as improvements in quality of life and liver biomarkers. Bitopertin is also currently being studied in APOLLO, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients that we initiated in May 2025. In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States based on our Phase 2 data. The FDA accepted our NDA for review in November 2025 and in February 2026 issued a complete response letter, or CRL. The FDA concluded that the AURORA and BEACON trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials, resulting in uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. In our Type A meeting during the second quarter of 2026, the FDA indicated that results of the ongoing Phase 3 APOLLO trial, if successful, could…

    Now

    In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States based on our Phase 2 data. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, accepted our NDA for review in November 2025 and in February 2026 issued a complete response letter, or CRL. The FDA concluded that the AURORA and BEACON trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials, resulting in uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. In our Type A meeting during the second quarter of 2026, the FDA indicated that results of the Phase 3 APOLLO trial, if successful, could serve as the basis for a response to the CRL and could potentially support a traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026, with an FDA decision anticipated by mid-2027.
  25. New MD&A

    In October 2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock for net proceeds…

    New paragraph in MD&A.

    From the filings

    Now

    In October 2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $485.9 million, after deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us.
  26. Changed MD&A

    During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities of $256.7 million…

    Adds "nine"; drops "six".

    From the filings

    Before

    During the six months ended June 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities of $245.1 million consisted primarily of aggregate net proceeds of $243.4 million from our underwritten offering in January 2025.

    Now

    During the nine months ended September 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities of $256.7 million consisted primarily of aggregate net proceeds of $243.4 million and $9.8 million from our underwritten offering in January 2025 and sales of shares of common stock pursuant to our Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement, or the Cantor ATM Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor, respectively.
Show the redline

Section by section. Added words and removed words against the earlier filing.

Cover page 2 changes

3 unchanged paragraphs

For the quarterly period ended June September 30, 2026

23 unchanged paragraphs

As of July 23, October 29, 2026 there were 38,392,844 45,540,842 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, outstanding.

Forward-looking statements 4 changes

11 unchanged paragraphs

• our ability to comply with our current and future debt obligations;

12 unchanged paragraphs

• the impact of global economic and political developments on our business, including rising inflation and capital market disruptions, geopolitical conflicts, economic sanctions and economic slowdowns or recessions that may result from such developments which could harm our research and development efforts as well as the value of our common stock and our ability to access capital markets; and

• the impacts of changes in the policies or regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities regarding development, approval, and marketing of products; and

9 unchanged paragraphs

• We have not yet progressed any product candidates other than bitopertin through a Phase 3 clinical trial and may be unable to successfully complete any additional clinical trials for any product candidates we develop. Certain of our programs are still in preclinical development and may never advance to clinical development.

28 unchanged paragraphs

Financial statements 26 changes

17 unchanged paragraphs

Preferred stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025

Common stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025; 38,345,666 38,619,312 and 37,890,616 shares issued and outstanding as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively

16 unchanged paragraphs

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

1 unchanged paragraph

Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

17 unchanged paragraphs

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan

Stock-based compensation expense

Foreign currency translation adjustments

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

Balance at September 30, 2026

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Continued)

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

18 unchanged paragraphs

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan

Sale of common stock in at-the-market offering,

net of issuance costs of $ 302

Stock-based compensation expense

Foreign currency translation adjustments

Unrealized gain on marketable securities

Balance at September 30, 2025

25 unchanged paragraphs

Proceeds from sale of common stock in at-the-market offerings, net of issuance costs paid

4 unchanged paragraphs

Net increase decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash ( 65,095

5 unchanged paragraphs

Note 1: Organization and Nature of the Business 1 change

3 unchanged paragraphs

The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of the Company continuing as a going concern. The Company expects that its existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities as of June September 30, 2026 of $ 717.7 682.8 million will enable the Company to fund its planned operating expense and capital expenditure requirements for at least twelve months from the date of issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company has incurred recurring losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception. As of June September 30, 2026, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $ 633.2 692.8 million. The Company expects its operating losses and negative operating cash flows to continue into the foreseeable future. The future viability of the Company is dependent on its ability to generate cash from operating activities or to raise additional capital to finance its operations. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever earn revenues or achieve profitability, or if achieved, that the revenues or profitability will be sustained on a continuing basis. In addition, the Company's preclinical and clinical development activities, manufacturing and commercialization of the Company's product candidates, if approved, may require significant additional financing.

Note 2: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies 4 changes

6 unchanged paragraphs

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June September 30, 2026 and for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 are unaudited. The financial data and other information contained in the notes hereto as of June 30, 2026 and for the three and six months ended June 30, 2026 and 2025 are also unaudited. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2025 was derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

September 30, 2026 and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2026 and 2025 are also unaudited. The condensed consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2025 was derived from the Company's audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the audited annual consolidated financial statements, and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which include only normal recurring adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of the Company's financial position as of June September 30, 2026 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2025, and the notes thereto, included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The results for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full years, or any other interim periods, or any future year or period.

6 unchanged paragraphs

Note 4: Marketable Securities 3 changes

Marketable securities as of June September 30, 2026 consisted of the following (in thousands):

13 unchanged paragraphs

As of June September 30, 2026 , all of the Company's marketable securities are available to the Company for use in current operations. As a result, the Company has classified all of these securities as current assets even though the stated maturity of some individual securities may be one year or more beyond the balance sheet date. The following table shows the fair value of the Company's marketable securities, by contractual maturity, as of June September 30, 2026 (in thousands):

2 unchanged paragraphs

The aggregate fair value of marketable securities with unrealized losses w as was $ 486.8 592.8 million and $ 41.3 million as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. As of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 seventy-two , ninety-four i nvestments and five investments were in an unrealized loss position, respectively. All such investments have been in an unrealized loss position for less than a one year and these losses are considered temporary. The Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until a recovery of their amortized cost, which may not occur until maturity. The Company expects that U.S. treasury, U.S. government agency, and corporate debt securities are subject to minimal credit risk. As a result, the Company did no t record any charges for credit-related impairments for its available-for-sale securities for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 .

Note 5: Fair Value Measurements 2 changes

1 unchanged paragraph

Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June September 30, 2026 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

15 unchanged paragraphs

There have been no impairments of the Company's assets measured and carried at fair value during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025. There were no changes in valuation techniques or transfers between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 financial assets during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025. The Company did not have any non-recurring fair value measurements on any assets or liabilities during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 .

Note 7: Licensing Activities and Business Development 5 changes

4 unchanged paragraphs

In January 2025, the Company made a milestone payment of $ 3.0 million upon the first administration to a patient in the Phase 2 clinical trial of selcodebart (DISC-0974) which was recorded within research and development in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025. As of June September 30, 2026 , no additional milestones were deemed probable of achievement.

3 unchanged paragraphs

In June 2025, the Company made a milestone payment of $ 10.0 million upon the initiation of the first Phase 3 clinical trial with a licensed product in a first indication which was recorded within research and development in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2025 . The next potential milestone payment is $ 15.0 million due upon regulatory approval in the United States with a licensed product in a first indication. As of June September 30, 2026 , this milestone was no t deemed probable of achievement.

3 unchanged paragraphs

In October 2023, the Company made a milestone payment of $ 5.0 million upon the first administration to a patient in a Phase 1 clinical trial for DISC-3405. In September 2025, the Company made a milestone payment of $ 10.0 million upon the first administration to a patient in a Phase 2 clinical trial for DISC-3405 which was recorded within research and development in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 . In April 2026, the Company made a milestone payment of $ 5.0 million upon the first administration to a patient in a Phase 1b clinical trial with a licensed product in a second indication which was recorded within research and development in the Company's condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026. As of June September 30, 2026 , no additional milestones were deemed probable of achievement.

1 unchanged paragraph

In December 2024, the Company entered into an out-license agreement with OBB pursuant to which the Company granted an exclusive license, with the right to grant sublicenses, to certain Gemini intellectual property. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received an upfront payment of $ 0.2 million with additional consideration receivable upon the achievement of certain clinical, regulatory and sales milestones up to $ 7.0 million, $ 35.0 million, an d $ 160.0 million, respectively. As of June September 30, 2026 , none of the milestones had been achieved nor were they considered probable of achievement.

2 unchanged paragraphs

As part of the transaction, the Company also obtained an exclusive license to certain intellectual property. Under the terms of the license, the Company is obligated to make certain development and sales-based milestone payments of up to $ 5.6 million and $ 20.0 million, respectively, for each compound. Additionally, the Company is required to pay royalties on net sales of licensed products at rates in the low single-digits. As of June September 30, 2026 , none of the milestones had been achieved, nor were they considered probable of achievement.

Note 8: Long-Term Debt 4 changes

5 unchanged paragraphs

The Company has recorded debt discount and debt issuance costs of $ 2.1 million related to borrowings under the Hercules Loan Agreement. Debt discount and unamortized debt issuance costs were recorded as a reduction of the carrying amount on the term loan and are amortized as interest expense using the effective-interest method. In addition, unamortized deferred financing costs of $ 0.4 million and $ 0.6 million were recorded in other assets as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively, related to the Company's right to borrow additional amounts in the future.

Interest expense related to the Term Loan Facility for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 was $ 0.9 1.7 million and $ 1.8 3.5 million, respectively. Interest expense related to the Term Loan Facility for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2025 was $ 0.9 million and $ 1.8 2.7 million, respectively. A s of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, the carrying value of the Term Loan Facility approximated its fair value.

The obligations under the Term Loan Facility as of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025 consisted of the following (in thousands):

3 unchanged paragraphs

The annual principal payments due under the Term Loan Facility as of June September 30, 2026 were as follows (in thousands):

1 unchanged paragraph

Note 9: Stockholders' Equity 6 changes

The Company was authorized to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $ 0.0001 par value per share . As of June September 30, 2026, no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.

The Company was auth orized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $ 0.0001 par value per share. As of June September 30, 2026 , 38,345,666 38,619,312 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

2 unchanged paragraphs

In October 2025, in connection with an underwriting agreement with Jefferies LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., the Company sold 2,619,049 shares of its common stock, at a public offering price of $ 84.00 per share. The Company also sold pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 59,523 shares of common stock at a price of $ 83.9999 per pre-funded warrant. The Company received aggregate net proceeds of $ 211.0 million, after deducting offering expenses of $ 14.0 million. As of June September 30, 2026 , none of the 59,523 pre-funded warrants had been exercised.

1 unchanged paragraph

In January 2025, in connection with an underwriting agreement with Jeffries LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated and Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., the Company sold 4,533,182 shares of its common stock, which included the exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to 615,000 additional shares of common stock, at a public offering price of $ 55.00 per share. The Company also sold pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 181,818 shares of common stock at a pri ce of $ 54.9999 per pre-funded warrant. The Company received aggregate net proceeds of $ 243.4 million, after deducting offering expenses of $ 15.9 million. As of June September 30, 2026 , none of the 181,818 pre-funded warrants had been exercised.

1 unchanged paragraph

In June 2023, the Company sold 3,015,919 shares of its common stock upon the completion of its public follow-on offering, which included the exercise in full by the underwriters of their option to purchase up to 420,000 additional shares of common stock, at a public offering price of $ 49.00 per share. The Company also sold, in lieu of shares of the Company's common stock, pre-funded warrants to purchase an aggregate of 204,081 shares of common stock at a price of $ 48.9999 per pre-funded warrant. The Company received aggregate net proceeds of $ 147.9 million, after deducting offering expenses of $ 9.9 million. As of June September 30, 2026 , none of the 204,081 pre-funded warrants had been exercised.

5 unchanged paragraphs

As of June During the three months ended September 30, 2026 2025 , the Company had sold an aggregate of 162,457 shares of common stock in Cantor ATM offerings under the August 2024 Shelf and pursuant to the Cantor ATM Agreement. Aggregate gross proceeds from the transaction were $ 10.1 million and the Company received $ 9.8 million in net proceeds, after deducting placement agent fees and offering expenses. There were no sales under the Cantor ATM Agreement during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026. and 2025 As of September 30, 2026 , $ 189.9 million of common stock remained available for issuance and sale under the Cantor ATM Agreement.

Note 10: Stock-Based Compensation 1 change

4 unchanged paragraphs

Total stock-based compensation expense recorded as research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, for employees, directors and non-employees is was as follows (in thousands):

3 unchanged paragraphs

Note 11: Income Taxes 1 change

The Company did no t record a provision or benefit for federal income taxes during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025. The Company recorded state income tax expense of $ 0.1 0.2 million and $ 0.2 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively, due to interest income. The Company continues to maintain a full valuation allowance against all of its deferred tax assets.

2 unchanged paragraphs

Note 12: Net Loss Pe r Share 2 changes

Basic and diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average common shares outstanding. The weighted-average common shares outstanding used in the basic and diluted net loss per share calculation includes pre-funded warrants issued in connection with the Company's underwritten offerings. As of June September 30, 2026 and June September 30, 2025 , 445,422 and 385,899 pre-funded warrants were outstanding, respectively.

3 unchanged paragraphs

The Company has generated a net loss in all periods presented, so the basic and diluted net loss per share are the same, as the inclusion of the potentially dilutive securities would be anti-dilutive. As of June September 30, 2026 and June September 30, 2025 , the C ompany excluded the following potential common shares from the computation of diluted net loss per share because including them would have had an anti-dilutive effect:

3 unchanged paragraphs

Legal proceedings 9 changes

The Company, from time to time, may be party to litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company was not subject to any material legal proceedings during the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 and, to the best of its knowledge, no material legal proceedings are currently pending or threatened.

1 unchanged paragraph

The Company enters into contracts in the normal course of business with contract research organizations ("CROs"), contract development and manufacturing organizations ("CDMOs") and other third parties for preclinical studies, clinical trials and manufacturing services. These contracts typically do not contain minimum purchase commitments and are generally cancelable by the Company upon written notice. Payments due upon cancellation consist of payments for services provided or expenses incurred, including noncancelable obligations of the Company's service providers, up to the date of cancellation and, in the case of certain arrangements with CROs and CDMOs, may include noncancelable fees. Under such agreements, the exact amounts owed by the Company in the event of termination will be based on the timing of the termination and the exact terms of the agreement. As of June September 30, 2026 , the Company has not recognized any amounts related to these contingencies as the amount and timing of such payments are not fixed and estimable.

2 unchanged paragraphs

16. Subsequent Events

Underwritten Offering

On October 20, 2026, the Company entered into an Underwriting Agreement (the "Underwriting Agreement") with Jefferies LLC, Leerink Partners LLC, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, and Cantor as representatives of the several underwriters listed on Schedule I thereto (the "Underwriters") related to an underwritten offering of 6,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company, par value $ 0.0001 per share, at a price to the public of $ 75.00 per share. In addition, the Company granted the Underwriters an option exercisable for 30 days from the date of the Underwriting Agreement to purchase, at the public offering price less any underwriting discounts and commissions, up to an additional 900,000 shares of the Company's common stock, which option the Underwriters exercised in full on October 26, 2026.

The net proceeds from the offering are expected to be approximately $ 485.9 million, after deducting the underwriting discount and estimated offering expenses. Certain existing investors and affiliates of the Company participated in the offering.

On November 4, 2026, Cantor acknowledged and accepted the Company's written notice to terminate the Cantor ATM Agreement, which termination became effective on November 4, 2026. As a result of such termination, the Company will not offer or sell any additional shares of its common stock under the Cantor ATM Agreement.

On November 5, 2026, the Company entered into a Sales Agreement (the "TD Cowen ATM Agreement"), with TD Securities (USA) LLC ("TD Cowen"), pursuant to which the Company may offer and sell shares of its common stock having aggregate gross proceeds of up to approximately $ 189.9 million from time to time in "at-the-market" offerings through TD Cowen, as sales agent.

The Company agreed to pay TD Cowen a commission of up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds of any shares sold by TD Cowen under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement. As of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, the Company has not sold any shares of common stock under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement.

MD&A 28 changes

4 unchanged paragraphs

In October 2026, we announced positive topline results from APOLLO, a randomized, double-blind, pivotal Phase 3 trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of bitopertin versus placebo in adults and adolescents aged 12 or older with EPP or XLP. Bitopertin achieved statistical significance on both co-primary endpoints versus placebo, with reduction in whole-blood metal-free protoporphyrin IX, or PPIX, from baseline (-41.4% vs. placebo, p<0.0001) and increase in average monthly total time in light without pain during month 6 (+12.2 hours vs. placebo, p=0.0010). Bitopertin also achieved statistical significance on all secondary endpoints versus placebo, including reduction in incidence rate of phototoxic reactions over the 6-month treatment period (p<0.0001), increase in cumulative total time in light without pain over the 6-month treatment period (p<0.0001), and increase in change from baseline in average daily sunlight exposure time to prodrome (p=0.0077, adults only). In addition, bitopertin demonstrated additional quality of life benefits versus placebo, including improved Patient Global Impression of Change, or PGIC, score (p<0.0001) and Patient Global Impression of Severity, or PGIS, score (p<0.0001). Bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. Consistent with prior studies, dizziness was the most commonly reported treatment emergent adverse event, or TEAE, in the bitopertin group (50%) and was mild or moderate and generally transient. There were no TEAEs above Grade 3.

We have also completed two Phase 2 clinical trials of bitopertin: BEACON, an open-label, parallel-dose clinical trial in EPP and XLP patients conducted at sites in Australia, and AURORA, a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial in EPP patients conducted at sites in the United States. In both trials, bitopertin significantly reduced the toxic metabolite, protoporphyrin IX, or PPIX and was associated with improvements in measures of time spent in sunlight and quality of life. In addition, bitopertin was generally well-tolerated. All participants in AURORA and BEACON were eligible to participate in HELIOS, an ongoing open-label, long-term extension study of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients. Interim data from HELIOS, presented in June 2025 and June 2026, demonstrated that longer term treatment of bitopertin was associated with sustained reductions in PPIX, as well as improvements in quality of life and liver biomarkers. Bitopertin is also currently being studied in APOLLO, a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients that we initiated in May 2025. In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States based on our Phase 2 data. The FDA accepted our NDA for review in November 2025 and in February 2026 issued a complete response letter, or CRL. The FDA concluded that the AURORA and BEACON trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials, resulting in uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. In our Type A meeting during the second quarter of 2026, the FDA indicated that results of the ongoing Phase 3 APOLLO trial, if successful, could serve as the basis for a response to the CRL and could potentially support a traditional approval. We completed enrollment in APOLLO (n=183) in the first quarter of 2026 and expect to report topline data in the fourth quarter of 2026. If successful, we plan to submit a response to the CRL and would then anticipate an FDA decision on our NDA by mid-2027.

In September 2025 we submitted a New Drug Application, or NDA, for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States based on our Phase 2 data. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, accepted our NDA for review in November 2025 and in February 2026 issued a complete response letter, or CRL. The FDA concluded that the AURORA and BEACON trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials, resulting in uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. In our Type A meeting during the second quarter of 2026, the FDA indicated that results of the Phase 3 APOLLO trial, if successful, could serve as the basis for a response to the CRL and could potentially support a traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026, with an FDA decision anticipated by mid-2027.

2 unchanged paragraphs

Selcodebart is the lead product candidate in our iron homeostasis portfolio and was licensed from AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, or AbbVie. Selcodebart is designed to suppress hepcidin production and increase serum iron levels. We completed a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy volunteers in the United States in June 2022, with results showing an acceptable tolerability profile and evidence of target engagement, iron mobilization and augmented erythropoiesis. We initiated a Phase 1b/2 clinical trial in June 2022 in patients with anemia of MF, with results from the Phase 1b portion of this clinical trial showing substantial and sustained reductions in hepcidin levels and increases in iron alongside strong hematologic responses across patient types and an acceptable tolerability profile. We initiated RALLY-MF, the open-label Phase 2 portion of this clinical trial, in December 2024 and reported initial data in December 2025 and interim data in June 2026, with results demonstrating meaningful overall anemia responses across all patient subgroups, regardless of baseline transfusion status and independent of concomitant Janus Kinase, or JAK, inhibitor therapy use. We expect to share additional data in the fourth quarter of 2026. If positive, we expect to and hold an end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the FDA for selcodebart in anemia of MF by the end of 2026. We anticipate initiating a Phase 3 clinical program for selcodebart in anemia of MF in the first half of 2027, subject to the outcome of our end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the FDA. We also initiated RALLY-IBD, a Phase 2 clinical trial of selcodebart in patients with IBD and anemia in the first quarter of 2026, with initial data anticipated in 2027, and we are planning exploratory studies in additional patient populations with anemia of chronic disease. We are also developing a preclinical anti-hemojuvelin, or HJV, monoclonal antibody, DISC-0998, which also targets hepcidin suppression and was licensed from AbbVie. DISC-0998 is designed to increase serum iron levels and has an extended serum half-life as compared to selcodebart. We believe this profile may be desirable in certain subsets of patients with anemia associated with inflammatory diseases.

In addition, we are developing DISC-3405, a monoclonal antibody against Transmembrane Serine Protease 6, or TMPRSS6, that we licensed from Mabwell Therapeutics, Inc., or Mabwell. DISC-3405 is part of our iron homeostasis portfolio and is designed to induce hepcidin production and reduce serum iron levels. We initiated a Phase 1 clinical trial of DISC-3405 in healthy adult volunteers in October 2023, and presented interim data from the single-ascending dose, or SAD, portion of this clinical trial in June 2024. We presented data from the multiple ascending dose, or MAD, portion of this clinical trial in December 2024, and presented updated data from both the SAD and MAD portions of this clinical trial in June 2025, with results showing an acceptable tolerability profile and evidence of target engagement, including dose-related increases in serum hepcidin and corresponding reductions in serum iron across all dose levels. We are developing DISC-3405 for the treatment of PV, SCD, and other hematologic disorders. We initiated RESTORE-PV, an open-label Phase 2 clinical trial of DISC-3405 in patients with PV, in June 2025, and reported initial efficacy data from Cohort A of this trial in September 2026, with results demonstrating that treatment with DISC-3405 increased hepcidin and lowered serum iron, translating to reduction in phlebotomy events, controlled hematocrit, and improved symptom burden in patients with PV. In this initial data, expected DISC-3405 was generally well-tolerated in participants in Cohort A and Cohort B, with adverse events that were consistent with underlying disease and a low rate of injection site reactions, which were mild and self-limited. We expect to report additional data from our RESTORE-PV clinical trial by the third quarter end of 2026 and topline data in 2027. If positive, and subject to engagement with the FDA, we anticipate initiating a Phase 3 clinical program for DISC-3405 in PV in 2027. We also initiated a Phase 1b, open-label clinical trial of DISC-3405 in patients with SCD in October 2025, with initial data expected in the fourth quarter of 2026, and plan to explore the role of therapeutic iron restriction in other indications.

As of June September 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $717.7 $682.8 million. In October 2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $485.9 million, after deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, including the net proceeds of our October 2026 underwritten public offering, will be sufficient to fund our current operating and capital expenditure plans and our debt service obligations into 2029, 2030, without taking into account any potential net cash inflows from bitopertin or any other marketed product, if approved during such period. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. See " Liquidity and Capital Resources" for additional details.

33 unchanged paragraphs

Comparison of the Three and Six Nine Months Ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025

The following table summarizes our results of operations for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):

9 unchanged paragraphs

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):

4 unchanged paragraphs

Research and development expenses were $46.9 $44.1 million for the three months ended June September 30, 2026, compared to $46.3 $50.3 million for the three months ended June September 30, 2025. The increase decrease of $0.6 $6.3 million was driven by increases of $7.7 million and $3.1 a $7.0 million reduction in expenses related to selcodebart (DISC-0974) and DISC-3405, respectively, primarily related to clinical trial advancement and a $10.0 million milestone payment incurred during the comparative period. There was also a decrease of $4.8 million in bitopertin development expenses, primarily related to drug manufacturing activities Personnel-related in the comparative period that did not recur in the current period. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in personnel related costs increased $5.9 of $3.8 million related to higher research and development headcount, including an increase of $3.1 $2.9 million in stock-based compensation driven by awards granted under our equity compensation plans. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $15.0 million in bitopertin Selcodebart development expenses primarily driven by a $10.0 increased $1.1 million, milestone payment and higher primarily related to drug manufacturing costs incurred during the comparative period. activities. Other research programs and expenses also decreased $1.1 increased $0.8 million.

Research and development expenses were $92.8 $136.9 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, compared to $74.1 $124.4 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025. The increase of $18.8 $12.5 million was primarily due to an increase of $13.1 $16.8 million in personnel-related costs related to higher research and development headcount, including an increase of $6.0 $8.8 million in stock-based compensation driven by awards granted under our equity compensation plans. DISC-3405 Selcodebart development expenses increased $10.6 $10.8 million primarily driven by increased related to clinical trial advancement and drug manufacturing activities. and a $5.0 million milestone payment triggered in the first quarter of 2026. Additionally, selcodebart (DISC-0974) DISC-3405 development expenses increased $9.7 $3.5 million primarily related to driven by increased clinical trial advancement and drug manufacturing activities These increases of $8.5 million which were partially offset by a decrease lower milestone payments of $14.1 $5.0 million. in Bitopertin development expenses decreased $19.0 million primarily driven by a $10.0 million milestone payment and higher drug manufacturing costs incurred during activities in the comparative period Other research programs and expenses also decreased $0.5 million. that did not recur in the current period.

1 unchanged paragraph

The following table summarizes our selling, general and administrative expenses for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025 (in thousands):

3 unchanged paragraphs

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $18.1 $20.1 million for the three months ended June September 30, 2026, compared to $15.1 $17.4 million for the three months ended June September 30, 2025. The increase of $3.1 $2.7 million was primarily due to an increase of $3.9 $2.3 million in personnel-related costs due to increased selling, general and administrative headcount, including an increase of $2.4 $2.2 million in stock-based compensation driven by awards granted under our equity compensation plans. This increase was partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in legal, consulting, and professional fees primarily related to changes in the timing and scope of commercialization activities.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $41.8 $61.8 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, compared to $27.3 $44.6 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025. The increase of $14.5 $17.2 million was primarily due to an increase of $12.6 $14.9 million in personnel-related costs due to increased selling, general and administrative headcount, including an increase of $5.1 $7.4 million in stock-based compensation driven by awards granted under our equity compensation plans and an increase of $1.6 million related to an organizational restructuring. There were also increases of $1.0 $1.1 million and $0.9 $1.2 million in other expenses and legal, consulting, and professional fees, respectively, primarily related to developing our commercialization capabilities.

1 unchanged paragraph

Other income (expense), net was $5.6 $4.7 million and $11.7 $16.4 million for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $6.2 $5.5 million and $12.2 $17.7 million for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2025, respectively. Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income from our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, partially offset by interest expense associated with our term loan.

Income tax expense was $0.1 million and $0.2 million for both the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, respectively, compared to $0.1 million and $0.2 $0.3 million for the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2025, respectively. This expense primarily relates to state income tax resulting from an increase in interest income.

3 unchanged paragraphs

To date, we have funded our operations primarily with proceeds from the sale of our convertible preferred stock and common stock, the proceeds from the merger with Gemini, proceeds from various private and public sales of our equity securities and proceeds from borrowings under the Hercules Loan Agreement. Through June September 30, 2026, we have received net proceeds of $144.5 million from sales of our Series Seed, Series A and Series B convertible preferred stock, $89.5 million from the merger with Gemini, $941.8 million from various private and public sales of our equity securities, and $57.6 million from net borrowings under the Hercules Loan Agreement. As of June September 30, 2026, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $717.7 $682.8 million.

In October 2026, we completed an underwritten public offering of shares of our common stock for net proceeds of approximately $485.9 million, after deducting estimated offering expenses payable by us.

We have incurred significant operating losses since inception and, as of June September 30, 2026, had an accumulated deficit of $633.2 $692.8 million. In addition, we expect to continue to incur significant and increasing expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, including the net proceeds of our October 2026 underwritten public offering, will be sufficient to fund our current operating and capital expenditure plans and our debt service obligations into 2029, 2030, without taking into account any potential net cash inflows from bitopertin or any other marketed product, if approved during such period. We have based these estimates on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. We may also pursue additional cash resources through public or private equity offerings, collaborations or additional debt financing.

5 unchanged paragraphs

Net increase decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (65,095

2 unchanged paragraphs

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, net cash used in operating activities of $106.4 $146.6 million was primarily due to our net loss of $123.0 million and the change in operating assets and liabilities of $8.6 $182.6 million. These were This was partially offset by non-cash expenses of $25.2 $40.2 million, which included $25.9 $40.5 million in stock-based compensation, reduced by $1.6 million from amortization and accretion the change in operating assets and liabilities of investment securities. $4.2 million.

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025, net cash used in operating activities of $89.3 $137.1 million was primarily due to our net loss of $89.3 $151.7 million and the change in operating assets and liabilities of $11.2 $4.9 million. These were partially offset by non-cash expenses of $11.2 $19.4 million which included $14.8 $24.3 million in stock-based compensation, reduced by $5.1 $6.9 million from amortization and accretion of investment securities.

1 unchanged paragraph

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, net cash provided by investing activities was primarily due to maturities of marketable securities of $266.4 $410.2 million, partially offset by purchases of marketable securities of $186.5 $305.0 million.

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025, net cash used in investing activities was primarily due to purchases of marketable securities of $405.9 $491.3 million, partially offset by maturities of marketable securities of $185.8 $320.8 million.

1 unchanged paragraph

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026, net cash provided by financing activities of $34.0 $40.2 million consisted primarily of net proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $30.0 million and proceeds from stock option exercises of $9.1 million.

During the six nine months ended June September 30, 2025, net cash provided by financing activities of $245.1 $256.7 million consisted primarily of aggregate net proceeds of $243.4 million and $9.8 million from our underwritten offering in January 2025 and sales of shares of common stock pursuant to our Controlled Equity Offering Sales Agreement, or the Cantor ATM Agreement, with Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., or Cantor, respectively.

18 unchanged paragraphs

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of June September 30, 2026 and the effects that such obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods (in thousands):

2 unchanged paragraphs

(1) Amounts reflect contractual rent payments due for our leased and subleased office spaces in Watertown, Massachusetts as of June September 30, 2026 and include contractual payments due under our forward-starting lease which is expected to commence in December 2026. The term date for our existing lease is December 31, 2029 and the term date for our existing sublease is November 30, 2026.

7 unchanged paragraphs

Market risk 2 changes

As of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, we had cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities of $717.7 $682.8 million and $791.2 million, respectively. As of June September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, our cash equivalents consisted of money market funds and corporate debt securities with original maturities of three months or less and our marketable securities consisted of U.S. treasury, U.S. government agency, and corporate debt securities which were classified as available-for-sale securities. Our primary investment objectives are the preservation of capital and the maintenance of liquidity, and our investment policy defines allowable investments based on quality of the institutions and financial instruments designed to minimize risk exposure. Our exposure to interest rate sensitivity is affected by changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Our marketable securities are subject to interest rate risk and will fall in value if market interest rates increase. Due to the short-term maturities and low risk profiles of our investments, we do not anticipate a significant exposure to interest rate risk. If market interest rates were to increase immediately and uniformly by one percentage point from levels as of June September 30, 2026, the net fair value of our marketable securities would decrease by approximately $4.2 $3.6 million.

1 unchanged paragraph

Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor and contract research. We do not believe that inflation had a material effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations during the three and six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025.

Controls and procedures 3 changes

1 unchanged paragraph

Our management, under the supervision and with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer (our Chief Executive Officer) and Principal Financial Officer (our Chief Financial Officer), has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June September 30, 2026. The term "disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Based on such evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have concluded that as of June September 30, 2026, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

1 unchanged paragraph

Except as described above, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended June September 30, 2026 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Risk factors 36 changes

6 unchanged paragraphs

Our net losses were $123.0 $182.6 million and $89.3 $151.7 million for the six nine months ended June September 30, 2026 and 2025, respectively. We had an accumulated deficit of $633.2 $692.8 million as of June September 30, 2026. Substantially all of our net losses have resulted from costs incurred in connection with our research and development programs and from selling, general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect our research and development expenses to continue to increase significantly in connection with the commencement and continuation of clinical trials of our product candidates. In addition, if we obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates, we will incur significant sales, marketing and manufacturing expenses. We also will continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company and expect to continue to incur significant and increasing operating losses over the next several years and for the foreseeable future. Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing pharmaceutical products, we are unable to predict the extent of any future losses or when we will become profitable, if at all. Even if we do become profitable, we may not be able to sustain or increase our profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

31 unchanged paragraphs

In November 2024, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement, as amended in June 2026, or the Hercules Loan Agreement, with the lenders party thereto, or the Lenders, and Hercules Capital, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent, or the Agent. The Hercules Loan Agreement provides for up to $200.0 million of senior secured term loans, or the Term Loan, available to us in multiple tranches. The Term Loan will mature on December 1, 2029. Our obligations under the Hercules Loan Agreement are secured, subject to customary permitted liens and other agreed-upon exceptions, by a first-priority perfected security interest in all of our tangible and intangible assets, other than intellectual property.

5 unchanged paragraphs

We believe that our cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities, including the net proceeds of our October 2026 underwritten public offering, will be sufficient to fund our current operating and capital expenditure plans and our debt service obligations into 2029, 2030, without taking into account any potential net cash inflows from bitopertin or any other marketed product, if approved during such period. However, we have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than expected. Our future capital requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:

20 unchanged paragraphs

We have not yet progressed any product candidates other than bitopertin through a Phase 3 clinical trial and may be unable to successfully complete any additional clinical trials for any product candidates we develop. Certain of our programs are still in preclinical development and may never advance to clinical development.

We currently have only three product candidates in clinical development, none only one of which has yet progressed through a completed Phase 3 clinical trial As such, to the point of producing topline results. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully complete a large-scale, pivotal clinical trials, trial to the point of producing a final clinical study report, obtain regulatory approvals, manufacture a commercial scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf or conduct sales and marketing activities necessary for successful commercialization. The majority of our programs are still in preclinical and early to mid-stage clinical development. Our clinical programs may not advance to the next stage of clinical development, and our preclinical programs may never advance to clinical development or through clinical development, as applicable. We may not initiate any clinical trial of our product candidates until we have submitted an IND to the FDA or comparable submissions with equivalent regulatory authorities and received regulatory clearance. We may not be able to submit INDs or other regulatory filings for any of our product candidates on the timelines we expect, if at all. For example, we may experience manufacturing delays or other delays with IND-enabling studies. Moreover, we cannot be sure that submission of regulatory filings with the FDA or other regulatory authorities will result in such regulatory authorities allowing clinical trials to begin on a timely basis or at all, or that, once begun, such trials will be completed on schedule, if at all, or that issues will not arise that require us to revise, postpone, suspend or terminate our clinical trials. For example, we filed an IND in April 2022 with the FDA to initiate the AURORA Phase 2 trial of bitopertin in EPP patients, but the FDA initially placed the initiation of this trial on clinical hold; we received clearance to initiate the study in July 2022 after the study design was finalized with the FDA, and we initiated the study in October 2022. Commencing any of our clinical trials is subject to finalizing the trial design based on discussions with the FDA and other regulatory authorities. Any guidance we receive from the FDA or other regulatory authorities is subject to change. The outcomes of our interactions with these regulatory authorities, including interactions critical to successfully advancing through the different phases of clinical development, such as end-of-phase 2 meetings with the FDA, may be difficult to predict ahead of time. In particular, regulatory authorities could change their position, including on the acceptability of our trial designs or the clinical endpoints selected, which may require us to complete additional clinical trials or result in the composition of stricter approval conditions than currently expected. Our ability to successfully advance from preclinical studies through the different phases of clinical development is therefore subject to significant uncertainty. Successful completion of our clinical trials is a prerequisite to submitting an NDA or a BLA to the FDA, a Marketing Authorisation Application, or MAA, to the European Medicines Agency, or EMA, or other marketing applications to regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, for each product candidate and, consequently, the regulatory approval of each product candidate.

A single well-controlled clinical trial may not be sufficient for approval. Historically, While the FDA has generally required two well-controlled clinical trials to support registration of a new drug or biologic, although exceptions have been made in cases of a severe disease with few treatment options, and in principle this exception may appear applicable to many of the diseases that we seek to treat, such as EPP, XLP, anemia of MF, DBA and others. More recently the FDA has indicated that its default position will be that one well-controlled clinical trial, combined with confirmatory evidence, will serve as the basis of marketing authorization of novel products, Nonetheless, the FDA and other regulators may always nonetheless require additional clinical trials to support regulatory approval.

14 unchanged paragraphs

Even if the FDA does find our clinical trial success criteria to be sufficiently supported and clinically meaningful at the time, we may not achieve the pre-specified endpoint to a degree of statistical significance in any pivotal or other clinical trials we may conduct for our product candidates. Further, even if we do achieve the pre-specified criteria, our trials may produce results that are unpredictable or inconsistent with the results of the more traditional efficacy endpoints in the trial. For example, in the Complete Response Letter, or CRL, that the FDA issued in February 2026 with respect to our NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP, the FDA agreed that clinical data from our AURORA and BEACON clinical trials provided sufficient evidence that bitopertin significantly lowers whole blood metal-free PPIX, but concluded that the trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials. As such, the FDA determined that there is uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. As a result, the FDA did not approve our NDA and indicated instead that we would need to provide evidence of clinical benefit from an additional trial, such as our ongoing Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled APOLLO clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients, to support a potential traditional approval. We reported positive topline results from APOLLO in October 2026, and plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026. The FDA also could change its view or give overriding weight to other efficacy endpoints over a primary endpoint, even if we achieve statistically significant results on that primary endpoint, if for example we do not do so on our secondary efficacy endpoints. The FDA also weighs the benefits of a product candidate against its risks and the FDA may view the efficacy results in the context of safety as not being supportive of approval. Other regulatory authorities in Europe and other countries may make similar findings with respect to these endpoints.

1 unchanged paragraph

From time to time, we may publicly disclose interim, top-line, initial or preliminary data from our clinical trials, which is based on a preliminary analysis of then-available data, and the results and related findings and conclusions are subject to change following a more comprehensive review of the data. For example, we announced initial data from our RALLY-MF Phase 2 selcodebart trial in patients with anemia of MF in December 2025 and additional interim data from this trial in June 2026, and announced initial data from our RESTORE-PV Phase 2 DISC-3405 trial in patients with PV in September 2026. We also may make assumptions, estimations, calculations and conclusions as part of our analyses of data, and may not have received or had the opportunity to fully and carefully evaluate all data. As a result, the interim, top-line, initial or preliminary results that we report may differ from future results of the same trials, or different conclusions or considerations may qualify such results, once additional data have been received and fully evaluated. Interim, top-line, initial and preliminary data from clinical trials are subject to the risk that one or more of the clinical outcomes may materially change as patient enrollment continues and more patient data become available. Interim, top-line, initial and preliminary data also remain subject to audit and verification procedures that may result in the final data being materially different from the interim, top-line, initial or preliminary data we previously published. As a result, interim, top-line, initial and preliminary data should be viewed with caution until the final data are available. Adverse differences between interim, top-line, initial or preliminary data and final data could significantly harm our business prospects and may cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate or decline.

34 unchanged paragraphs

Any results from early preclinical studies and clinical trials of bitopertin, selcodebart, DISC-0998, DISC-3405 or our other product candidates or programs may not necessarily be predictive of the results from later preclinical studies and clinical trials. For example, we previously announced positive initial data from our RALLY-MF Phase 2 BEACON and AURORA clinical trials of bitopertin in patients with EPP, but there can be no assurance that our Phase 3 APOLLO clinical trial of bitopertin selcodebart in patients with EPP will be successful or that the results of our APOLLO clinical trial will support a traditional approval anemia of bitopertin for EPP. In addition, we previously announced positive initial data MF and from our RALLY-MF RESTORE-PV Phase 2 clinical trial of selcodebart DISC-3405 in patients with anemia of MF. PV. However, there can be no assurance that selcodebart or DISC-3405 will achieve the desired effects in this the respective indication. Further, we announced positive results from a Phase 1 clinical trial of DISC-3405 in healthy adult volunteers in December 2024 and June 2025, which may not be indicative or predictive of future clinical trial results. Similarly, even if we are able to complete our planned preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates according to our current development timeline, the results from such preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates may not be replicated in subsequent preclinical studies or clinical trial results.

7 unchanged paragraphs

FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority, will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving regulatory approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

We conducted BEACON, our Phase 2 open-label, parallel-dose clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients, at sites in Australia. All participants who completed BEACON were eligible to participate in HELIOS, an open-label, long-term extension study of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients, that we are also conducting in Australia, as well as the United States. We are also conducting APOLLO, a conducted our Phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled APOLLO clinical trial of bitopertin in EPP and XLP patients, in Canada, Europe and Australia, as well as the United States. We may in the future choose to conduct additional clinical trials of our product candidates outside the United States, including in Europe, Australia, or other foreign jurisdictions. The acceptance of trial data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States by the FDA may be subject to certain conditions. In cases where data from clinical trials conducted outside the United States are intended to serve as the sole basis for regulatory approval in the United States, the FDA will generally not approve the application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data are applicable to the United States population and United States medical practices, (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and (iii) the data may be considered valid without the need for an on-site inspection by the FDA or, if the FDA considers such an inspection to be necessary, the FDA is able to validate the data through an on-site inspection or other appropriate means. Additionally, the FDA's clinical trial requirements, including sufficient size of patient populations and statistical powering, must be met. Many foreign regulatory bodies have similar approval requirements. In addition, such foreign trials will be subject to the applicable local laws of the foreign jurisdictions where the trials are conducted. There can be no assurance that the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority, will accept data from trials conducted outside of the United States or the applicable jurisdiction. If the FDA or any comparable foreign regulatory authority does not accept such data, it would result in the need for additional trials, which would be costly and time-consuming and delay aspects of our business plan, and which may result in our product candidates not receiving regulatory approval or clearance for commercialization in the applicable jurisdiction.

19 unchanged paragraphs

For example, we submitted an NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States in September 2025. In February 2026, the FDA issued a CRL. Although the FDA agreed that clinical data from our AURORA and BEACON clinical trials provided sufficient evidence that bitopertin significantly lowers whole blood metal-free PPIX, the FDA concluded that the trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials. As such, the FDA determined that there is uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect in PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria. As a result, the FDA did not approve our NDA and indicated instead that we would need to provide evidence of a clinical benefit from an additional clinical trial, such as our ongoing APOLLO trial, to support a potential traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026 and would then anticipate an FDA decision on our NDA by mid-2027.

94 unchanged paragraphs

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator's resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator's own evaluation of a potential collaboration. Such factors a potential collaborator will use to evaluate a collaboration may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the

We face significant competition in seeking appropriate collaborators. Whether we reach a definitive agreement for a collaboration will depend, among other things, upon our assessment of the collaborator's resources and expertise, the terms and conditions of the proposed collaboration and the proposed collaborator's own evaluation of a potential collaboration. Such factors a potential collaborator will use to evaluate a collaboration may include the design or results of clinical trials, the likelihood of approval by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the potential market for the subject product candidate, the costs and complexities of manufacturing and delivering such product candidate to patients, the potential of competing products, the existence of uncertainty with respect to our ownership of technology, which can exist if there is a challenge to such ownership without regard to the merits of the challenge and industry and market conditions generally. The collaborator may also consider alternative product candidates or technologies for similar indications that may be available to collaborate on and whether such a collaboration could be more attractive than the one with us for our product candidate. The terms of any additional collaborations or other arrangements that we may establish may not be favorable to us.

14 unchanged paragraphs

Any performance failure on the part of our existing or future manufacturers could delay clinical development or regulatory approval. If our current CDMOs cannot perform as agreed, we may be required to replace such CDMOs. In addition, there has been increased governmental focus in the U.S. on contracting with Chinese companies for the development or manufacturing of pharmaceutical products. For example, legislation pending Section 851 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, enacted in Congress would prohibit U.S. December 2025 and commonly referred to as the BIOSECURE Act, establishes restrictions on federal funding in connection with procurement of biotechnology equipment or and services produced or provided by certain named Chinese from designated "biotechnology companies of concern," and loans and grants to, and federal contracts contracting with any entity entities that uses biotechnology use, or enter into contracts they know will require the use of, such equipment or services from one in performing federal contracts, and certain uses of these entities. The legislation would also give the federal government the authority to name additional "biotechnology loan and grant funds involving such equipment or services. Covered companies of concern" that are engaged in research activities with designated through an interagency process incorporating the Department of Defense's Section 1260H list of Chinese government military companies and that pose a risk of U.S. specified foreign adversary and national security criteria. The Office of Management and Budget is required to publish an initial list by December 18, 2026. The prohibitions take effect in phases following implementing amendments to the Federal Acquisition Regulation, subject to exceptions and a five-year transition period for certain existing arrangements In addition, in 2025, the United States imposed substantial tariffs on imports from China as well as on other trading partners, including Canada, Mexico, and the EU. We currently rely on certain foreign or foreign-owned third-party vendors to manufacture certain materials used in clinical trials of our product candidates or to provide services in connection with certain clinical trials or certain discovery activities. Our engagement with these foreign and foreign-owned vendors may be subject to additional U.S. legislation, investigations, sanctions, further escalation of tariffs, trade restrictions and other foreign regulatory requirements, which could cause us to need to identify alternate service providers, increase the cost or reduce the supply of materials available to us, delay the procurement or supply of these materials, delay or impact clinical trials, or have an adverse effect on our ability to secure significant commitments from governments to purchase our potential therapies, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and business prospects. We continue to assess the legislation and the tariffs as they develop to determine the effect, if any, on our contractual relationships.

33 unchanged paragraphs

Competitors may infringe any patents we may own or in-license. In addition, any patents we may own or in-license also may become involved in inventorship, priority, validity or unenforceability disputes. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that one or more of any patents we may own or in-license is not valid or is unenforceable or that the other party's use of our technology that may be patented falls under the safe harbor to patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. §

Competitors may infringe any patents we may own or in-license. In addition, any patents we may own or in-license also may become involved in inventorship, priority, validity or unenforceability disputes. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate, and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that one or more of any patents we may own or in-license is not valid or is unenforceable or that the other party's use of our technology that may be patented falls under the safe harbor to patent infringement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(1). There is also the risk that, even if the validity of these patents is upheld, the court may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that any patents we may own or in-license do not cover the technology in question or that such third-party's activities do not infringe our patent applications or any patents we may own or in-license. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of any patents we may own or in-license at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Such litigation or proceedings could substantially increase our operating losses and reduce the resources available for development activities or any future sales, marketing, patient support or distribution activities. We may not have sufficient financial or other resources to conduct such litigation or proceedings adequately. Some of our competitors may be able to sustain the costs of such litigation or proceedings more effectively than we can because of its greater financial resources and more mature and developed intellectual property portfolios. Uncertainties resulting from the initiation and continuation of patent litigation or other proceedings could have a material adverse effect on our ability to compete in the marketplace.

11 unchanged paragraphs

• a court prohibiting us from developing, manufacturing, marketing or selling our current product candidates, including bitopertin, DISC-0974 selcodebart and DISC-3405, or future product candidates, or from using our proprietary technologies, unless the third-party licenses its product rights to us, which we are not required to do, on commercially reasonable terms or at all;

53 unchanged paragraphs

We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions.

We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions. Obtaining foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or receive applicable regulatory approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our product candidates will be harmed.

9 unchanged paragraphs

In May 2024, we received rare pediatric disease designation for bitopertin in patients with EPP and XLP. The FDA defines "rare pediatric disease" as a (i) serious or life-threatening disease in which the serious or life-threatening manifestations primarily affect ages from birth to 18 years, including age groups often called neonates, infants, children and adolescents; and (ii) a rare disease or condition within the meaning of the Orphan Drug Act. Vouchers for rare pediatric disease drugs are awarded for qualifying applications when the drug receives approval. However, designation of a product candidate as a product for a rare pediatric disease does not guarantee that a marketing application for such product candidate will meet the eligibility criteria for a rare pediatric disease priority review voucher at the time the application is approved. In September 2025, we submitted an NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin in EPP and XLP in the United States and we requested a rare pediatric disease review voucher. In February 2026, the FDA issued a CRL indicating that, while accelerated approval was not warranted, results from an additional clinical trial, such as our ongoing APOLLO clinical trial, could serve as evidence to support a potential traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to submit a response to engage with the CRL following receipt FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of topline data from APOLLO. 2026 and would then anticipate an FDA decision on our NDA by mid-2027. However, even if the FDA ultimately approves our NDA for bitopertin, the FDA may determine that the NDA does not meet the eligibility criteria for a priority review voucher.

5 unchanged paragraphs

We sought accelerated approval of bitopertin for EPP and XLP, and we may seek accelerated approval for any of our other product candidates, as appropriate. A product may be eligible for accelerated approval if it treats a serious or life-threatening condition and generally provides a meaningful advantage over available therapies. In addition, it must demonstrate an effect on a surrogate endpoint that is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit or on a clinical endpoint that can be measured earlier than irreversible morbidity or mortality, or IMM, that is reasonably likely to predict an effect on IMM or other clinical benefit. It is possible that at the time of submission of a marketing application or as a result of the FDA's review of the marketing application, the FDA may determine that our product candidate is not eligible for accelerated approval or that accelerated approval is not warranted. For example, in February 2026, the FDA issued a CRL in response to our NDA for accelerated approval of bitopertin for EPP and XLP. Although the FDA agreed that clinical data from AURORA and BEACON provided sufficient evidence that bitopertin significantly lowers whole blood metal-free PPIX, the FDA concluded that the trials did not show evidence of association between percent change in PPIX and sunlight exposure-based endpoints as measured in the trials. As such, the FDA determined that there is uncertainty regarding whether bitopertin's effect on PPIX is reasonably likely to predict clinical benefit, despite the strong mechanistic and biological plausibility supporting the use of the PPIX biomarker in protoporphyria, and therefore decided that accelerated approval was not warranted. Moreover, FDA may revise how it implements accelerated approval, which could negatively affect the development of our current or future product candidates.

1 unchanged paragraph

If we are not able to obtain accelerated approval for a product candidate, we may be required to conduct additional clinical trials beyond those that are contemplated, which would increase the expense of obtaining, and delay the receipt of, traditional FDA approval, if received at all. For example, as we were not able to obtain accelerated approval for bitopertin in EPP or XLP, we will need to successfully complete at least one additional clinical trial, such as our ongoing Phase 3 APOLLO trial, before responding to the FDA's CRL in support of a potential traditional approval. With the positive topline results from APOLLO, we plan to engage with the FDA and resubmit an NDA by the end of 2026 and would then anticipate an FDA decision on our NDA by mid-2027.

40 unchanged paragraphs

Comprehensive laws similar to the CCPA have been passed in numerous other states outside of California. These laws are substantially similar in scope and contain many of the same requirements and exceptions as the CCPA, including a general exemption for clinical trial data and limited obligations for entities regulated by HIPAA. However, We cannot yet determine the full impact these laws or other such future laws, regulations and standards may have on our current or future business. Any of these laws may broaden their scope in the future, and similar laws have been proposed on both federal and state levels. Such proposed legislation, if enacted, may add additional complexity, variation in requirements, restrictions and potential legal risk, require additional investment of resources in compliance programs, impact strategies and the availability of previously useful data and could result in increased compliance costs and/or changes in our business practices and policies.

In addition to comprehensive consumer privacy laws, certain states have enacted privacy laws with more limited focus. For example, the state of Washington passed the "My Health My Data Act" to protect medical and health information not subject to HIPAA. This law has a private right of action, which increases the relevant compliance risk. Connecticut and Nevada A small number of states have also passed similar laws regulating consumer health data. Other states have proposed and/or passed legislation that regulates the privacy and/or security of certain specific types of information. For example, a small number of states have passed laws that regulate biometric information. The existence of comprehensive privacy laws in different states in the country make our compliance obligations more complex and costly and may increase the likelihood that we may be subject to enforcement actions or otherwise incur liability for noncompliance. These various privacy and security laws may impact our business activities, including our identification of research subjects, relationships with business partners and ultimately the marketing and distribution of our products.

4 unchanged paragraphs

Despite Brexit, the UK and EEA data protection regimes remain largely aligned. However, going forward, there is increasing risk for divergence in application, interpretation and enforcement of the data protection laws as between the UK and EEA, creating additional regulatory uncertainty. For example, the UK Data (Use and Access) Act 2025, or the UK Act, now in force, further differentiates the UK's data protection regime. In December 2025, the European Commission adopted a decision determining that the UK continues to provide a level of data protection that is "essentially equivalent" to the EU standards and extended the validity of the UK adequacy decision for six years, through December 2031. While this renewal reduces immediate adequacy concerns, uncertainty remains regarding how UK data protection laws will evolve in the medium to longer term. The lack of clarity on future UK laws and regulations and their interaction with EU laws and regulations may affect our efforts to maintain a harmonized approach to processing European personal data and expose us to two parallel regimes where the UK GDPR and EU GDPR both apply with differing interpretation and enforcement approaches. This could increase our legal risk, uncertainty, complexity and compliance cost associated with the handling of European personal data, and may require us to adapt our privacy and data security compliance programs to account for legal and regulatory divergence between the UK and EEA. The European Commission has also proposed reforms under the "Digital Omnibus" package which, if adopted, may further modify GDPR-related requirements, including by clarifying the scope of "personal data" and the treatment of coded or de-identified data, potentially requiring further adjustments to our European privacy compliance framework. In the EEA, the NIS 2 Directive, or NIS 2, is replacing the cybersecurity legal framework under the current NIS framework, aiming to ensure a high level of cybersecurity in the region. NIS 2 expands on the scope of the current NIS framework, extending to additional sectors and expanding the list of in-scope healthcare organizations providing services in the EEA, including to certain providers engaged in research and development of medicinal products. To the extent applicable, the new regime imposes direct obligations on management regarding compliance with NIS 2, requiring covered organizations to put in place certain cyber risk management measures, and strengthens incident reporting requirements and provides supervisory authorities with greater oversight. The majority of these obligations will not come into force until national legislation implementing NIS 2 becomes effective in the relevant EU Member State. EU Member States had until October 17, 2024 to transpose NIS 2 into national legislation, although many countries have still not completed this process. As such, the cybersecurity regulatory landscape in the EU is currently fragmented and uncertain. To the extent we become subject to NIS 2, we may need to increase investment in our cybersecurity compliance programs. Under NIS 2, companies may be subject to administrative fines of up to the higher amount of €10 million or 2% of worldwide annual revenue.

European law further regulates our digital activities through the ePrivacy Directive in the EU and the Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations in the UK, each of which establishes obligations concerning our deployment of cookies and tracking technologies on our website and imposes requirements applicable to direct marketing communications. Failure to adhere to these obligations could subject us to regulatory fines, the magnitude of which varies by jurisdiction. Compliance with these requirements may affect our business operations and give rise to additional compliance burdens.

3 unchanged paragraphs

In the United States, the AI regulatory environment is complex and uncertain. Over the past year, States have advanced and in some cases passed, dozens of numerous AI-focused laws, focusing on AI governance such as the Colorado ADMT Act and regulation, CCPA regulations on automated decision-making, including on deployment of AI in healthcare settings, creating a fragmented compliance landscape that may heighten regulatory scrutiny and legal exposure. Certain privacy laws further regulate automated decision-making and confer individual rights, such as data deletion, that may be difficult to reconcile with AI-driven processes. At the federal level, the current Administration has endorsed a federal moratorium on the enforcement of state AI laws, including through a December 11, 2025, executive order on "Ensuring a National Policy Framework for Artificial Intelligence." So far, these efforts have not been successful at curtailing state action on AI regulation, contributing to a complicated legislative patchwork, which may be litigated in state and federal courts.

8 unchanged paragraphs

We are highly dependent on many of our key employees and members of our executive management team as well as the other principal members of our management, scientific and clinical teams. Although we have entered into employment letter agreements with certain of our executive officers, each of them may terminate their employment with us at any time. We do not maintain "key person" insurance for any of our executives or other employees. In addition, we rely on consultants and advisors, including scientific and clinical advisors, to assist us in formulating our research and development and commercialization strategy. Our consultants and advisors may be employed by employers other than us and may have commitments under consulting or advisory contracts with other entities that may limit their availability to us. We also conducted an organizational restructuring in February 2026, which could impede future recruiting and hiring efforts. If we are unable to continue to attract and retain high quality personnel, our ability to pursue our growth strategy will be limited.

4 unchanged paragraphs

Like other companies in our industry, we, and our third party vendors, have experienced, and will continue to experience, cybersecurity threats and incidents relating to our information technology systems and infrastructure. Although we devote resources designed to protect our information systems and infrastructure, we realize that cyberattacks are a threat, and there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent or adequately address information security compromises, incidents or breaches that would result in business, legal, financial or reputational harm to it, or would have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Any failure to prevent or mitigate cybersecurity incidents, data breaches, compromises or other improper access to, use of, or disclosure of protected information, including our clinical data or patients' personal data could require us to notify impacted stakeholders (including affected individuals, regulators and investors) and result in significant liability through litigation and regulatory investigations and enforcement actions, including under state (e.g., state breach notification and consumer protection laws), federal (e.g., HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, or HITECH), and international law (e.g., the GDPR), and may cause a material adverse impact to our reputation, affect our ability to conduct new studies and potentially disrupt our business.

We rely on our third-party providers to implement effective security measures and identify and correct for any such failures, deficiencies, vulnerabilities, compromises, cybersecurity incidents or data breaches. We also rely on our employees and consultants to safeguard their security credentials and follow our policies and procedures regarding use and access of computers and other devices that may contain protected information and our sensitive information. If we or our third-party providers fail to maintain or protect our information technology systems, infrastructure and data integrity effectively or fail to anticipate, plan for or manage significant disruptions to our information technology systems and infrastructure, we or our third-party providers could have difficulty preventing, detecting and controlling such cyber-attacks, and any such attacks could result in the losses described above as well as disputes with physicians, patients and our partners, regulatory sanctions or penalties, increases in operating expenses, expenses or lost revenue or other adverse consequences, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, prospects and cash flows. Any failure by such third parties to prevent or adequately mitigate cybersecurity incidents, data breaches, compromises or other improper access to or disclosure of such information could have similarly adverse consequences for us. If we are unable to prevent or adequately mitigate the impact of such cybersecurity incidents, compromises or data breaches, we could be exposed to litigation and governmental investigations, inquiries, orders, penalties or fines, which could lead to a potential disruption to our business and financial penalties or losses. By way of example, the CCPA creates individual privacy rights for California consumers and increases the privacy and security obligations of entities handling certain personal data. The CCPA provides for civil penalties of up to $7,500 per violation, as well as a private right of action for certain types of data breaches that has, and is expected to continue to, increase the volume of data breach related litigation filed in California. Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability for data breaches we experience, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that such limits are sufficient to protect us from material damages or claims related to our privacy and data security obligations. Further, although we maintain cyber liability insurance, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities related to cybersecurity incidents or data breaches we may experience.

California. Our contracts may not contain limitations of liability for data breaches we experience, and even where they do, there can be no assurance that such limits are sufficient to protect us from material damages or claims related to our privacy and data security obligations. Further, although we maintain cyber liability insurance, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities related to cybersecurity incidents or data breaches we may experience.

2 unchanged paragraphs

We also conducted an organizational restructuring in February 2026. We may not realize, in full or in part, the anticipated benefits, savings and improvements in our cost structure from this restructuring effort due to unforeseen difficulties, delays or unexpected costs. If we are unable to realize the expected operational efficiencies and cost savings from this restructuring, our operating results and financial condition would be adversely affected. Furthermore, the effects of this restructuring may be disruptive to our operations. For example, headcount reductions could yield unanticipated consequences, such as increased difficulties in implementing our business strategy, including retention of remaining employees.

As of June September 30, 2026, we had 165 173 full-time employees and no part-time employees. We expect to experience significant growth in the number of our employees and the scope of our operations, particularly as we mature as a public company and in the areas of product development, regulatory affairs and, in anticipation of the potential regulatory approval of bitopertin, sales, marketing and distribution. To manage our anticipated future growth, we must continue to implement and improve our managerial, operational and financial systems, expand our facilities and continue to recruit and train additional qualified personnel. Due to our limited financial resources, we may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations or recruit and train additional qualified personnel. The expansion of our operations may lead to significant costs and may divert our management and business development resources. Any inability to manage growth could delay the execution of our business plans or disrupt our operations.

66 unchanged paragraphs

If our existing securityholders sell, or indicate an intention to sell, substantial amounts of our common stock in the public market, the trading price of our common stock could decline. As of June September 30, 2026, we had 38,345,666 38,619,312 shares of common stock outstanding. All outstanding shares of common stock, other than shares held by our affiliates are freely tradable, without restriction, in the public market. In addition, shares of common stock that are subject to outstanding options of ours are or will become eligible for sale in the public market to the extent permitted by the provisions of various vesting agreements and Rules 144 and 701 under the Securities Act. If these shares are sold, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

1 unchanged paragraph

As of June September 30, 2026, our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 31% 30% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, if these stockholders were to choose to act together, they would be able to significantly influence all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, as well as our management and affairs. For example, these persons, if they choose to act together, would significantly influence the election of directors and approval of any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. This concentration of voting power could delay or prevent an acquisition of us on terms that other stockholders may desire.

3 unchanged paragraphs

Other information 38 changes

Termination of Cantor ATM Agreement

On November 4, 2026, Cantor acknowledged and accepted our prior written notice to terminate the Cantor ATM Agreement, effective November 4, 2026.

Entry into TD Cowen Sales Agreement

On November 5, 2026, we entered into a Sales Agreement, or the TD Cowen ATM Agreement, with TD Securities (USA) LLC, or TD Cowen, with respect to an "at-the-market" offering program under which we may issue and sell, from time to time at our sole discretion, shares of our common stock, having an aggregate offering price of up to approximately $189.9 million, or the Shares, through TD Cowen. The issuance and sale, if any, of the Shares may be by any method permitted by law deemed to be an "at the market offering" as defined in Rule 415 of the Securities Act, including, without limitation, sales made directly on Nasdaq.

We are not obligated to sell any of the Shares, and TD Cowen is not required to sell any specific number or dollar amount of the Shares under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement. We or TD Cowen may suspend or terminate the offering of the Shares upon notice to the other party and subject to other conditions.

Subject to our request to sell the Shares, TD Cowen will act on a best efforts basis and use commercially reasonable efforts to sell the Shares on our behalf, from time to time consistent with its normal sales practices and applicable state and federal laws, rules and regulations and Nasdaq rules, based upon instructions from us (including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions we may impose). We will pay TD Cowen a commission of up to 3.0 percent (3.0%) of the gross proceeds of any of the Shares sold through TD Cowen under the TD Cowen ATM Agreement. Pursuant to the TD Cowen ATM Agreement we have also provided TD Cowen with customary indemnification and contribution rights.

The foregoing description of the TD Cowen ATM Agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreement, a copy of which is filed herewith as Exhibit 10.6 and incorporated herein by reference. This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not constitute an offer to sell or the solicitation of an offer to buy the securities discussed herein, nor shall there be any offer, solicitation, or sale of the securities in any state in which such offer, solicitation or sale would be unlawful prior to registration or qualification under the securities laws of any such state.

The following table discloses any officer (as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Exchange Act) or director who entered into, modified or terminated a Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement or non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement (as such terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K) during the three months ended June September 30, 2026:

7 unchanged paragraphs

( December 31, 2026 )

Chief Financial Officer

Trading plan intended to satisfy the affirmative defense conditions of Securities Exchange Act Rule 10b5-1(c)

( December 31, 2027 )

( September 15, 2026 )

1 unchanged paragraph

Amended and Restated Employment Agreements

On July 29, 2026, we entered into amended and restated employment agreements, effective as of July 29, 2026 (collectively, the "Amended Employment Agreements"), with each of John D. Quisel, J.D., Ph.D., our President and Chief Executive Officer; Jean Franchi, our Chief Financial Officer; Pamela Stephenson, M.P.H., our Chief Commercial Officer; William Savage, M.D., Ph.D., our Chief Medical Officer; and Jonathan Yu, M.B.A., our Chief Operating Officer (collectively, the "Executives"). The Amended Employment Agreements supersede and replace all Executives' prior employment agreements. The Amended Employment Agreements will be filed as exhibits to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2026.

The amended and restated employment agreement with Dr. Quisel (the "Quisel Amended Employment Agreement") provides for his continued at-will employment as our President and Chief Executive Officer, an annual base salary of $735,000, and a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 60% of base salary, in accordance with his previously approved base salary and target annual bonus opportunity. Dr. Quisel will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to our employees.

Consistent with the terms of Dr. Quisel's prior employment agreement, the Quisel Amended Employment Agreement continues to provide that, if Dr. Quisel is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case outside the period beginning three months before and ending 12 months after a Change in Control (the "Change in Control Period"), Dr. Quisel will be entitled to (i) continued base salary payments for 12 months; (ii) a lump-sum payment equal to a pro rata portion of his target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (iii) immediate vesting of 25% of his then-unvested equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iv) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward

COBRA coverage for up to 12 months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

In lieu of the severance payments and benefits described above, the Quisel Amended Employment Agreement provides that if Dr. Quisel is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case during the Change in Control Period, Dr. Quisel will be entitled to (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of 21 months of his then-current base salary (or the base salary in effect immediately before the Change in Control, if higher), 1.75 times his target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (ii) immediate and full vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to 18 months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

All severance payments and benefits under the Quisel Amended Employment Agreement are conditioned upon the timely execution by Dr. Quisel of a separation agreement and release of claims in our favor and continued compliance with his continuing obligations. If any payments or benefits to Dr. Quisel would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, those payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax, but only if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Dr. Quisel than payment in full. Dr. Quisel also remains subject to confidentiality, assignment of inventions, nonsolicitation, noncompetition and other restrictive covenants.

The amended and restated employment agreement with Ms. Franchi (the "Franchi Amended Employment Agreement") provides for her continued at-will employment as our Chief Financial Officer, an annual base salary of $550,000, and a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 45% of base salary, in accordance with her previously approved base salary and target annual bonus opportunity. Ms. Franchi will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to our employees.

Consistent with the terms of Ms. Franchi's prior employment agreement, the Franchi Amended Employment Agreement continues to provide that, if Ms. Franchi is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case outside the Change in Control Period, Ms. Franchi will be entitled to (i) continued base salary payments for nine months; (ii) any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to nine months following the termination date, subject to her continued copayment at the active employee rate.

In lieu of the severance payments and benefits described above, the Franchi Amended Employment Agreement provides that, if Ms. Franchi is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case during the Change in Control Period, Ms. Franchi will be entitled to (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of 15 months of her then-current base salary (or the base salary in effect immediately before the Change in Control, if higher), 1.25 times her target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (ii) immediate and full vesting of all of her outstanding equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to 15 months following the termination date, subject to her continued copayment at the active employee rate.

All severance payments and benefits under the Franchi Amended Employment Agreement are conditioned upon the timely execution by Ms. Franchi of a separation agreement and release of claims in our favor and continued compliance with her continuing obligations. If any payments or benefits to Ms. Franchi would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, those payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax, but only if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Ms. Franchi than payment in full. Ms. Franchi also remains subject to confidentiality, assignment of inventions, nonsolicitation, noncompetition and other restrictive covenants.

Ms. Pamela Stephenson

The amended and restated employment agreement with Ms. Stephenson (the "Stephenson Amended Employment Agreement") provides for her continued at-will employment as our Chief Commercial Officer, an annual base salary of $538,000, and a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 45% of base salary, in accordance with her previously approved base salary and target annual bonus opportunity. Ms. Stephenson will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to our employees.

Consistent with the terms of Ms. Stephenson's prior employment agreement, the Stephenson Amended Employment Agreement continues to provide that, if Ms. Stephenson is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case outside the Change in Control Period, Ms. Stephenson will be entitled to (i) continued base salary payments for nine months; (ii) any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to nine months following the termination date, subject to her continued copayment at the active employee rate.

In lieu of the severance payments and benefits described above, the Stephenson Amended Employment Agreement provides that if Ms. Stephenson is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case during the Change in Control Period, Ms. Stephenson will be entitled to (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of 15 months of her then-current base salary (or the base salary in effect immediately before the Change in Control, if higher), 1.25 times her target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (ii) immediate and full vesting of all of her outstanding equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to 15 months following the termination date, subject to her continued copayment at the active employee rate.

All severance payments and benefits under the Stephenson Amended Employment Agreement are conditioned upon the timely execution by Ms. Stephenson of a separation agreement and release of claims in our favor and continued compliance with her continuing obligations. If any payments or benefits to Ms. Stephenson would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, those payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax, but only if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Ms. Stephenson than payment in full. Ms. Stephenson also remains subject to confidentiality, assignment of inventions, nonsolicitation, noncompetition and other restrictive covenants.

The amended and restated employment agreement with Dr. Savage (the "Savage Amended Employment Agreement") provides for his continued at-will employment as our Chief Medical Officer, an annual base salary of $556,000, and a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 45% of base salary, in accordance with his previously approved base salary and target annual bonus opportunity. Dr. Savage will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to our employees.

Consistent with the terms of Dr. Savage's prior employment agreement, the Savage Amended Employment Agreement continues to provide that, if Dr. Savage is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case outside the Change in Control Period, Dr. Savage will be entitled to (i) continued base salary payments for nine months; (ii) any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to nine months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

In lieu of the severance payments and benefits described above, the Savage Amended Employment Agreement provides that if Dr. Savage is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case during the Change in Control Period, Dr. Savage will be entitled to (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of 15 months of his then-current base salary (or the base salary in effect immediately before the Change in Control, if higher), 1.25 times his target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (ii) immediate and full vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to 15 months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

All severance payments and benefits under the Savage Amended Employment Agreement are conditioned upon the timely execution by Dr. Savage of a separation agreement and release of claims in our favor and continued compliance with his continuing obligations. If any payments or benefits to Dr. Savage would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, those payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax, but only if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Dr. Savage than payment in full.. Dr. Savage also remains subject to confidentiality, assignment of inventions, nonsolicitation, noncompetition and other restrictive covenants.

The amended and restated employment agreement with Mr. Yu (the "Yu Amended Employment Agreement") provides for his continued at-will employment as our Chief Operating Officer, an annual base salary of $530,000, and a target annual bonus opportunity equal to 45% of base salary, in accordance with his previously approved base salary and target annual bonus opportunity. Mr. Yu will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit plans generally available to our employees.

Consistent with the terms of Mr. Yu's prior employment agreement, the Yu Amended Employment Agreement continues to provide that, if Mr. Yu is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case outside the Change in Control Period, Mr. Yu will be entitled to (i) continued base salary payments for nine months; (ii) any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to nine months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

In lieu of the severance payments and benefits described above, the Yu Amended Employment Agreement provides that if Mr. Yu is terminated by us without Cause or resigns for Good Reason, in either case during the Change in Control Period, Mr. Yu will be entitled to (i) a lump-sum cash payment equal to the sum of 15 months of his then-current base salary (or the base salary in effect immediately before the Change in Control, if higher), 1.25 times his target annual bonus for the fiscal year of termination and any earned but unpaid bonus for the preceding fiscal year; (ii) immediate and full vesting of all of his outstanding equity awards subject to time-based vesting; and (iii) payment of the Company's employer contribution toward COBRA coverage for up to 15 months following the termination date, subject to his continued copayment at the active employee rate.

All severance payments and benefits under the Yu Amended Employment Agreement are conditioned upon the timely execution by Mr. Yu of a separation agreement and release of claims in our favor and continued compliance with his continuing obligations.

If any payments or benefits to Mr. Yu would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, those payments and benefits will be reduced to the extent necessary to avoid the excise tax, but only if the reduction would result in a greater after-tax benefit to Mr. Yu than payment in full. Mr. Yu also remains subject to confidentiality, assignment of inventions, nonsolicitation, noncompetition and other restrictive covenants.

Exhibits 11 changes

5 unchanged paragraphs

First Amendment to the Loan and Security Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2026 by and between the Registrant and Hercules Capital, Inc.

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and John Quisel, J.D., Ph.D.

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and Jean Franchi.

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and Pamela Stephenson, M.P.H.

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and William Savage, M.D., Ph.D.

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated as of July 29, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and Jonathan Yu, M.B.A.

Sales Agreement, dated as of November 5, 2026, by and between Disc Medicine, Inc. and TD Securities (USA) LLC.

8 unchanged paragraphs

+ Portions of this document that constitute confidential information have been redacted pursuant to Item 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K.

# Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan.

1 unchanged paragraph

Date: November 5, 2026

3 unchanged paragraphs

Date: November 5, 2026

2 unchanged paragraphs

Unchanged: Financial Statements (Unaudited), Unregistered sales of stock, Notes to the financial statements, Note 3: Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash, Note 6: Other Accrued Expenses, Note 13: Segment Information, Note 14: Commitments and Contingencies, Defaults on senior securities, Mine safety disclosures

Compared by code from the two filings' text and XBRL. Not advice.

The reading, claim by claim

  1. • other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption "Risk Factors."
  2. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.
  3. For the quarter ended September 30, 2026, Disc Medicine, Inc. reported: Net income -$59.5 million.

3 of 4 claims matched the filing text.

Not found in the filing text

  • The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

From the filing

Item 6.

Item 6.

Exhibits

84

Signatures

85 i

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, or Quarterly Report, of Disc Medicine, Inc., or the Company, contains or incorporates statements that constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our or our management team's expectations, hopes, beliefs, intentions or strategies regarding the future. In addition, any statements that refer to projections, forecasts or other characterizations of future events or circumstances, including any underlying assumptions, are forward-looking statements. The words "anticipate," "believe," "contemplate," "continue," "could," "estimate," "expect," "intends," "may," "might," "plan," "possible," "potential," "predict," "project," "should," "will," "would" and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements, but the absence of these words does not mean that a statement is not forward-looking. Forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may include, for example, statements about:

• the initiation, timing, progress, results, and cost of our research and development programs and our current and future preclinical studies and clinical trials, including statements regarding the timing of initiation and completion of studies or trials and related preparatory work, the period during which the results of the trials will become available, and our research and development programs;

• our ability to efficiently discover and develop product candidates;

• our ability to successfully manufacture our drug substances and product candidates for preclinical use, for clinical trials and on a larger scale for commercial use, if approved;

• our ability to obtain funding for our operations necessary to further develop and, if approved, commercialize our product candidates;

• our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of bitopertin and any of our other product candidates, and the timing of any such potential approvals;

• our ability to commercialize our products, if approved;

• the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved;

• the implementation of our business model, and strategic plans for our business and product candidates;

• the scope of protection we are able to establish and maintain for intellectual property rights covering our product candidates;

• estimates of our future expenses, revenues, capital requirements, and our needs for additional financing;

• our ability to comply with our current and future debt obligations;

• the potential benefits of strategic collaboration agreements, our ability to enter into strategic collaborations or arrangements, and our ability to attract collaborators with development, regulatory and commercialization expertise;

• future agreements with third parties in connection with the commercialization of our product candidates, if approved;

• the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates, and our ability to serve those markets;

• our financial performance;

• the rate and degree of market acceptance of our product candidates;

• regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries;

• our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;

• our ability to produce our products or product candidates with advantages in turnaround times or manufacturing cost;

• the success of competing therapies that are or may become available;

• our ability to attract and retain key scientific or management personnel;

• the impact of laws and regulations;

• developments relating to our competitors and our industry;

• the impact of global economic and political developments on our business, including rising inflation and capital market disruptions, geopolitical conflicts, economic sanctions and economic slowdowns or recessions that may result from such developments which could harm our research and development efforts as well as the value of our common stock and our ability to access capital markets;

• the impacts of changes in the policies or regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, or comparable foreign regulatory authorities regarding development, approval, and marketing of products; and 1

• other risks and uncertainties, including those listed under the caption "Risk Factors.1"

These forward-looking statements are based on information available to us at the time of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and current expectations, forecasts and assumptions, and involve a number of judgments, risks and uncertainties. Accordingly, forward-looking statements should not be relied upon as representing our views as of any subsequent date, and we do not undertake any obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date they were made, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required under applicable securities laws.

The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors. As a result of a number of known and unknown risks and uncertainties, our actual results or performance may be materially different from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section titled "Risk Factors" included within Item 1A of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

2

RISK FACTOR SUMMARY

Below is a summary of the principal factors that make an investment in our common stock speculative or risky. This summary does not address all of the risks that we face. Additional discussion of the risks summarized in this risk factor summary and other risks that we believe are material to our investors can be found below under the heading "Item 1A. Risk

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS DISC MEDICINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLID ATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

September 30,

2026

December 31,

2025

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$

89,983

$

91,145

Marketable securities

592,833

700,007

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

14,589

12,746

Total current assets

697,405

803,898

Property and equipment, net

890

1,159

Right-of-use assets, operating leases

697

1,096

Other assets

496

726

Total assets

$

699,488

$

806,879

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$

6,074

$

9,018

Accrued external research and development expenses

16,321

11,451

Other accrued expenses

11,756

15,561

Operating lease liabilities, current

209

611

Total current liabilities

34,360

36,641

Long-term debt, net

59,745

29,159

Operating lease liabilities, non-current

1,133

1,253

Total liabilities

95,238

67,053

Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)

Stockholders' equity:

Preferred stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025

—

—

Common stock, $ 0.0001 par value; 100,000,000 shares authorized as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025; 38,619,312 and 37,890,616 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively

4

4

Additional paid-in capital

1,299,773

1,249,043

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

( 2,770

)

965

Accumulated deficit

( 692,757

)

( 510,186

)

Total stockholders' equity

604,250

739,826

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

$

699,488

$

806,879

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.2

5

DISC MEDICINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

September 30,

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

2026

2025

2026

2025

Operating expenses:

Research and development

$

44,080

$

50,334

$

136,917

$

124,416

Selling, general and administrative

20,081

17,362

61,843

44,636

Total operating expenses

64,161

67,696

198,760

169,052

Loss from operations

( 64,161

)

( 67,696

)

( 198,760

)

( 169,052

)

Other income (expense), net:

Interest income

6,454

6,412

19,879

20,349

Interest expense

( 1,714

)

( 917

)

( 3,466

)

( 2,724

)

Other (expense) income

( 5

)

( 18

)

5

47

Total other income (expense), net

4,735

5,477

16,418

17,672

Loss before income taxes

( 59,426

)

( 62,219

)

( 182,342

)

( 151,380

)

Income tax expense

( 109

)

( 102

)

( 229

)

( 273

)

Net loss3

$3

( 59,5353

)

$

( 62,321

)

$

( 182,571

)

$

( 151,653

)

Net loss per share, basic and diluted

$

( 1.53

)

$

( 1.77

)

$

( 4.72

)

$

( 4.39

)

Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

38,904,676

35,178,691

38,695,405

34,516,134

Comprehensive loss:

Net loss

$

( 59,535

)

$

( 62,321

)

$

( 182,571

)

$

( 151,653

)

Other comprehensive (loss) income:

Foreign currency translation adjustments

3

—

( 9

)

( 1

)

Unrealized (loss) gain on marketable securities

( 1,165

)

445

( 3,726

)

430

Total other comprehensive (loss) income

( 1,162

)

445

( 3,735

)

429

Comprehensive loss

$

( 60,697

)

$

( 61,876

)

$

( 186,306

)

$

( 151,224

)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

DISC MEDICINE, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(Unaudited)

Common Stock

$0.0001 Par Value

Additional

Paid-In

Accumulated Other

Comprehensive

Accumulated

Total

Stockholders'

Shares

Amount

Capital

Income (Loss)

Deficit

Equity

Balance at December 31, 2025

37,890,616

4

1,249,043

965

( 510,186

)

739,826

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

67,811

—

1,010

—

—

1,010

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

218,322

—

—

—

—

—

Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan

13,715

—

687

—

—

687

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

11,946

—

—

11,946

Foreign currency translation adjustments

—

—

—

( 10

)

—

( 10

)

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

—

—

—

( 1,526

)

—

( 1,526

)

Net loss

—

—

—

—

( 63,504

)

( 63,504

)

Balance at March 31, 2026

38,190,464

$

4

$

1,262,686

$

( 571

)

$

( 573,690

)

$

688,429

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

113,359

—

2,356

—

—

2,356

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

41,843

—

—

—

—

—

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

13,948

—

—

13,948

Foreign currency translation adjustments

—

—

—

( 2

)

—

( 2

)

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

—

—

—

( 1,035

)

—

( 1,035

)

Net loss

—

—

—

—

( 59,532

)

( 59,532

)

Balance at June 30, 2026

38,345,666

$

4

$

1,278,990

$

( 1,608

)

$

( 633,222

)

$

644,164

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

235,353

—

5,770

—

—

5,770

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of restricted stock units

30,880

—

—

—

—

—

Issuance of common stock under employee stock purchase plan

7,413

—

408

—

—

408

Stock-based compensation expense

—

—

14,605

—

—

14,605

Foreign currency translation adjustments

—

—

—

3

—

3

Unrealized loss on marketable securities

—

—

—

( 1,165

)

—

( 1,165

)

Net loss

—

—

—

—

( 59,535

)

( 59,535

)

Balance at September 30, 2026

38,619,312

$

4

$

1,299,773

Similar companies

Companies of similar size in SIC 2834 and related industry codes: the same peer list as the financial tables.